what is the opinions of the Beretta A400 Parallel Target guns, the one with the blue receiver?
Pro's and Con's.
Thanks,
Jackpot1
Pro's and Con's.
Thanks,
Jackpot1
Disagree 100%.I totally agree about the KO system. It's a must have.
Don't really see the connection with my post and Tadgarvin 's but , Like I said each to his own. I tried the 400 and wasn't that impressed . If you are, that's fine. We all shoot different guns for a reason. I shoot the 391 when I have neck/back trouble now and then due to the light recoil. I never was a fan if adjustable ribs and I can get any POI I desire in the adjustments on stock shims and comb since I put an adjustable comb on my 391. It cost me about 200 bucks which still leaves my 391 way under the cost of the 400 . Tron has probably done as much trigger work on Berettas as anybody and I agree with him about the triggers. Different strokes for different folks. Enjoy-- It's all good. Shoot Well!I can't believe Tadgarvin is calling Beretta a liar. I've owned both the
A400 sporting and trap. Both worked fine. During the Grand, I bought
the A400 Muti-Target. What a sweet gun! Adjustable comb, adjustable
rib, extended controls. I feel it has eclipsed the blue receiver guns.