Trapshooters Forum banner

Recoil reduction

4K views 39 replies 29 participants last post by  Chris Zautner  
#1 ·
I’m having some minor shooting related shoulder issues. They’re not a huge issue right now but I’m afraid it will only get worse. I’m looking for any insight you might have about recoil reducers for a Kolar max trap TA.
 
#10 ·
This is probably the best bang for the buck
And if he goes to them to get it he can get the gun fitted to him which makes a big difference, well worth the money in my opinion.

I had a used one that I put on a Perizza and they fitted it to me.

Sad thing is it just sets in my safe, I never shoot it any more

I have an HT5, a HT RS and a Model 12 all with stock locks

Just having a gun that fits makes all the difference in the World
 
#22 ·
International Bunker shooters use less than 7/8 oz of shoot, and break much more difficult targets than ATA trap. Might be worth a try, using less shot. You can drop to 1 ounce with High Gun, and Perfect Pattern is a good powder for 7/8. You need to use a tapered hull (like Remington) and a CB wad one size shorter, because of the dense powders. Most people that have tried less shot, don’t go back to using 9/8.
 
#39 ·
Chris, no doubt your scenario did Phil Simms irreparable damage to his reputation. When I saw your original post on Phil I couldn't believe my eyes and that he actually made that stock. I got my K80 stock from him around the same time you did and it was perfect, amazing and I can't say enough good things about his quality of work. What he did to your stock was unimaginable and worse, his initial response to your dissatisfaction blew me out of the water. Having spent some time with him in his shop, I can only guess he must have had some physical or mental issue at the time, or didn't have a CNC pattern for inletting your Remington, it just doesn't make sense. I would hope your case was a one-off issue because there are thousands of Pro-Soft owners out there with perfect stocks. It was a Twilight Zone thing - Go figure.
 
#24 ·
Another vote for the PFS. In my opinion it's the biggest bang for your buck. The fact that you can swap it between guns, with minimal expense, and save your original wood was the biggest factor for me. I've been battling a shoulder impingement for the better part of a year and a half and the PFS has kept me from having to stop shooting. With some stretching and muscle building I feel that I may be going back to my original wood stock soon. But in the mean time I am really enjoying the PFS. 1oz @1180 is a dream to shoot with this set up!
 
#11 ·
1) proper fit, especially lop.
2) lighter loads (7/8 oz at 1145 fps for 12 ga, 3/4 oz at 1145 fps for 20 ga).
3) recoil reduction device like those above or a recoil pad designed to mitigate felt recoil (I’ve heard good things about Falcon Strike).

My approach would be to go in the order above until I found the solution.
 
#20 ·
1) proper fit, especially lop.
2) lighter loads (7/8 oz at 1145 fps for 12 ga, 3/4 oz at 1145 fps for 20 ga).
3) recoil reduction device like those above or a recoil pad designed to mitigate felt recoil (I’ve heard good things about Falcon Strike).

My approach would be to go in the order above until I found the solution.
Absolutely. And I would second the advice on directed exercise as in physical therapy even
 
#19 ·
Agreed. Along with all of the other great advice above, I admit that our Beretta A400 Xcel Multi-target with Kick-Off built into the stock is a very soft shooter, even with 1-1/8 oz, 1200- 1350 fps loads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N Bare
#30 ·
I have not used this. I met one person who did and they like it. I'm wondering if anybody here has used the Falcon Strike hydraulic recoil pad?

 
#35 ·
I am in the jk80 camp. I have both ProSoft on my K80 Trap Special and SoftTouch on my CG Summit Trap guns. ProSoft and StockLock are similar in function but costly as the stocks are custom fited to you (which is the way it should be). Both are wood stocks, while the PFS, an excellent system, has that propholactic mechanical look. On the other hand a more economical and almost as good as ProSoft in terms of feel and doesn't require a bespoke stock, is SoftTouch out of Portland Oregon where the comb and butt pad are stationary and the stock moves under the comb. ProSoft and StockLock the receiver moves back into your stationary stock. SoftTouch is much less costly and will give you a much more perceived recoil feel with no pain, but if you want the best go with ProSoft bespoke stock from Phil Simms.