Trapshooters Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

Difference Between IMR700X and Hodgdon 700X

56K views 33 replies 22 participants last post by  George MT.  
#1 · (Edited)
I've recently started using IMR700X as a substitute for the unavailable Clays, and am fairly happy with it for 24 gram loads at 1325-1350fps. I happened to see some "700X" in a local gun store a few weeks ago and snapped it up, only to realize when I got it out yesterday that it is labeled "Hodgdon 700X" and "Made in USA" as opposed to the powder I've been using which is labeled "IMR700X" and "Made in Canada, Packaged in USA". I've read that some "700X" was made in the US for Hodgdon by Alliant several years ago. Is that still the case? Is there any difference in the powders? I tried to call Hodgdon yesterday but they appear to have closed early for Thanksgiving---
 
#4 ·
In a perfect world, I would bypass the Hodgdon 700X and pick up another 8# jug of IMR 700X when my current supply of the IMR version is finished. But I haven't found much choice these days - all shotgun powders are in short supply and the Hodgdon version of 700X is more available, at least in my area.

I understand that Hodgdon owns the IMR brand (and Win) and doesn't actually produce its own powder. I'm also aware that some powders that Hodgdon distributes have two brand names (Win 231 and HP-38) but are exactly the same powder with different packaging (to maintain "brand loyalty"). So the question remains:

Is there any difference between the Hodgdon and IMR brands of 700X? Are they the same powder? The fact that they are manufactured in different countries suggests that they are probably different. I thought someone might know the answer to these questions. Anyone??
 
#5 ·
IMR was purchased by Hodgdon a few years back. 700x was produced in Quebec and packaged in Plattsburgh (remember the metal cans). Leading up to the sale, IMR was having on and off quality control problems and many shipments were turned back by the packaging company.

Plattsburgh packaging was dropped after the purchase.
 
#6 ·
Both the IMR and Hodgdon versions I have are recent production, purchased in the last four months and have different countries of manufacture - H = USA, IMR = Canada. So the issue in 2003, when Hodgdon acquired the IMR brand, probably doesn't have any bearing on the current powders. The QA issues may have been why Hodgdon temporarily had Alliant make IMR 700x in the US.

So, are the CURRENT versions of Hodgdon and IMR 700X the same? If not, how do they differ? Given the popularity of 700X, I'm sure someone has the answers----
 
#7 ·
RE: why Hodgdon temporarily had Alliant make IMR 700x in the US.

Second hand information.....

I was told that on and off quality control problems are still a problem for powder coming out of Canada.

I was also lead to believe that the IMR type powder shortage that started early last year was because of rejected powder and they could never catch up after that ....
 
#9 ·
I have used a lot of Hodgdon Powders, Multiple kegs of Clays, International Clays, Universal, TiteGroup, multiple kegs of Varget, BLC-2, one Keg of H4895 and a couple kegs of H4831SC. I have been pleased with the performance and lot to lot consistancy. If I were to get some Hodgdon 700X, I would be confident
 
#12 ·
Common sense dictates that you don't mix the two and be sure to check the charge weight when changing. I have both brands and see no difference between them.
 
Save
#14 ·
Thanks for the comments. Even if it's "safe" to use the two interchangeably I've found that other powders with Hodgdon and IMR variants (4895 and 4350) produce different chronograph data in rifle loads. So I think I'll just hold the powder until I can talk to them on Monday. I'll post a reply when I have the definitive word---
 
#15 · (Edited)
I usually use Red Dot and Green Dot but last spring I bought a 8 lb jug of Hi-Skor 700-X because that was all I could get. The label says Hodgdon made in Canada and packaged in USA. IMR is not anywhere on the plastic jug. I have only loaded 1 oz loads so far and they all worked just fine.
 
#18 ·
IMR makes the powder in Canada at their facility, then Hodgdon imports it to the US and packages it at their facility in KS and markets it with their branding. 700X, 800X, TrailBoss, and PB are no longer IMR brand powders. They are Hodgdon brand powders.

It is the same product just rebranded to the Hodgdon label.

Dave Campbell
Customer Service Representative
Hodgdon Powder Company
6430 Vista Drive
Shawnee, KS 66218
913-362-9455 Ext. 117
dcampbell@hodgdon.com
 
Save
#17 ·
USUALLY when an IMR and Hodgdon powder bear the same number, the Hodgdon version will have an "H"-prefix to the number. H4350 and IMR4350, like H4831 and IMR4831, are NOT the same. The Hodgdon versions usually are a little slower-burning.

Ed
 
#22 ·
"700x i shot many years ago was clean . this crap is dirty as hell"

Maybe they got their 700X and 800X mixed up again (wouldn't be the first time it seemed that happened). With no colored flakes to ID it, who knows what we have.

I got some 700X one time that had white flakes in it. When I called the 913 number to ask about it, the guy on the line said, "It's okay to use.". End of conversation.

Bob Falfa

P.S. Here's their Customer Service page. http://www.imrpowder.com/contactus.html
 
#23 ·
The 700x I used back in the late 1970s was very dirty and it smoked so much you could always tell who on the line was using it. On a few occasions when three or more shooters on a squad were using it we had to stop the shooting for a minute or two on calm nights under the lights to allow the fog to clear. I quite often found small chunks of wood in it and when I asked IMR about that, I was told that was normal as wood was part of the composition and production of 700x.

Ed
 
#24 ·
Marketing and enotional attachment are always interesting factors. If the man from Hodgdon, David Campbell, says it is the same product I would be ok. Having studied human nature, I would bet on this experiment: Make 200 reloads, 100 with IMR marked product and 100 with Hodgdon marked product mixed in a bucket. Get five known 700X shooters to randomly grab 25 and shoot a round. I'll bet no one could tell the difference. I also bet at least two walk away claiming their scores are down due to the new powder not being as good as the old powder. We're kind of funny like that.
 
#26 ·
Over the years 700X was always dirty, nothing has changed today..
I switched to 700X because Red Dot was dirty. Then, last year, I loaded an OOOLLLLDDDDD can of 700X and had a lot of dirty bore, unlit powder flakes, problems. Even with the problems I broke 2 100 straights with it. Then got another jug of new-new 700X and the bbl is bright and shines like a new penny between shots. Even less plastic. Dirty bores now are coming from the Win AA Heavy Target loads I am shooting. Bloopers and off sounding shots. I will be glad when the 20 flats are gone. Cost me targets so I switvhed to using them as practice ammo and use the 700X in tournaments.

Don T
 
Save
#28 ·
I've found 700X to burn clean and perform well using loads of 16.4 grs. and 17.5 grs. with 1 1/8 oz. I've used about 16 lbs. this year. I also found you need about 1-1.5 grs. less than Mfg recommended loading to achieve published speeds.
 
#29 ·
I have both. Both have similar labels except Hogdon has their name and logo on front and back. Both say "made in Canada, Packaged in USA. I wouldn't mix them as they are going to be different lot #s. My IMR has a lower or earlier lot #. When you switch over, make sure to weigh your charges as they may be a little different density.

Both look identical but funny thing is the IMR has a noticible stronger alcohol odor and the Hogdon has very little of that odor. I asked when I purchased it and was told they were the exact same. The rifle powders are a different story and cannot be loaded the exact same. H4350 is a little slower and has similar but slightly different load data, as well as the other rifle powder. As stated earlier, the 700x is the same 700x. Lot to lot will vary slightly with any powder regardless of who owns the name.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.