While looking for a new gun last month, looking at Berettas and Brownings mostly, the young male clerk asked (off the record) what the difference between what I was looking at and a CZ over and under they also sold, for about $1,700 less (I can't remember the model, but the CZ was less than $700. I inspected the CZ and was looking for cheap engineering and design all over the gun. I am not an armament engineer, nor a gunsmith (though I was an Ordinance Division officer in the Navy as a part of my career).
The action had conical locking lugs, just like the Beretta, the barrels were ported (not my cup of tea, but still an engineering cost), the sights were very acceptable, it felt great to me when shouldered. Were there tool marks within the action? To be sure. But the beauty of the wood, the depth of the blueing, the common sense action design, the decent trigger attested to a decent gun at an even more amazing price point.
I've owned CZ rifles (I understand they are not made in the same place as CZ shotguns) and they were impressively built Mauser actions and very accurate and consistent with wonderful set triggers. I'm not saying the CZ is a Beretta, but to a young man who makes barely above minimum wage, the CZ is absolutely a valid option for an over and under. Not all of us can afford a $2,400 plus shotgun.
I knew the kid wanted the CZ because he couldn't afford the Beretta. After inspecting it, I set it down and said something like: "It is a fine shotgun for an impressive price." I saw a big smile on his face. My dream gun was a Beretta, but that doesn't mean I should destroy his dream. The CZ was the right choice for him and the Beretta was the right choice for me.