Rastoff is right, but I'd like to add that in (strict) offset, the pad is straight back from the receiver; all that's happened is that the stock is effectively "thinner" (but maybe not actually) near the top, at least.*
With cast, the pad s not centered on receiver, but is to the left (cast on) or right (cast off) from a line projected straight back from the rib.
*But it really has to be more than the comb, which is why moveable combs so often fail to live up to what is hoped for them. The whole stock has to be thinned a bit in most cases, since the face is not just a single "notch", but when the notch is moved, say to the right, the rest of the face and its bones and flesh move with it. And if there is not a plan to allow for the room they will need, moving the comb will just displace the basic problem (that eyes are inboard from the cheeks) from the top of the comb to the side of it.
Neil