Trapshooters Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

What is wrong with early K-32 receivers?

7.4K views 27 replies 16 participants last post by  GN7777777  
Well now, Al, there were some differences between the earliest Model 32s (they are not and never were referred to by Krieghoff as K-32s) and their successors. As Bob said, those differences aren't terribly important, but they do exist. The very first Model 32s contained more hand-machining and hand-fitting as well as some actual Remington Model 32 parts. Most Model 32s were "all" Krieghoff but those earliest guns were exceptions.

While upfitting Model 32s with K-80 internals is a great investment in your Model 32, only release trigger guns benefit from the change enough to make it worthwhile. Second design and newer K-80 hammers have the release lugs forged into the hammers instead of the hammers having to be drilled for the insertion of a pin, which often resulted in broken hammers down the road. But such work is expensive - when I had a Model 32 combo converted in 1995, the K-80 trigger group alone cost $750 plus the labor to fit it.

As far as Model 32 receivers not being "hard", they are not case-hardened like K-80 receivers but they certainly are not "soft" and are no softer than most Browning or Berettas.

Ed
 
Save
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.