I have been toying with the idea of (trying) to 'improve' how wads are named, cited and cross-referenced.
While I will freely admit needing to go to school for up to three years to get up to the level of 'ignorant', detangling 'wads' seems harder than Chinese Arithmetic ... <i>especially></i> when trying to make sense of what Gualandi and B&P call their wads, then what BPI & PR ... re-name them.
I'm working from these two charts, but I'd be VERY appreciative of additions, formatting suggestions ... I'll be doing this in Excel, I suspect.
Bob