Trapshooters Forum banner

1 - 17 of 17 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,741 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
OK today I am lazy and I have a question. Is there a nice 1200 fps 1 1/8 load for Vectan powder using the Windjammer wad in a Rem hull?

DT
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,741 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
What Vectan powder? They make quite a few different powders? Vectan GM3, D20, A1 and Prima-V powders all show 1-1/8 oz loads.

Check out the below link.

http://www.ballisticproducts.com/images/LD12Vectan.pdf

I'm too lazy to check out your link. I already told you that. Why don't you look up all combinations for windjammer wads FOR me so I can get a quick and easy <control> P for future reference?

Haven't you been paying attention to the tenor of these threads? People ask questions expecting you to look up the answer and they think you owe it to them to be precise. I am just putting into words what the practice has been. Simpler the better.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,741 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
man, you are lazy!!!!!!!!

jack mc

So what? I want an answer. I deserve an answer just because I asked a question. GIVE ME THE ANSWER I WANT.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,741 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
put the beer and go lay down. I'll see if I can find you something.

jack mc

Don't drink beer. Or anything else for that matter. Too lazy to bend my elbow don't you know. Fixing to go shoot Thursday League. If I can convince my trigger to pull itself. Too lazy to pull the trigger too....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,620 Posts
So what? I want an answer. I deserve an answer just because I asked a question. GIVE ME THE ANSWER I WANT.
I found you a load about 46 grs of what ever powder you want and windjammer wad should get you about 1800 fps. there hows that.

jack mc
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,741 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
I found you a load about 46 grs of what ever powder you want and windjammer wad should get you about 1800 fps. there hows that.

jack mc

I seriously doubt the above. 46 gn of fffG is about half enough for a 1200 fps 1 1/8 ounce 12 ga load behind a .125 card wad, 3/8 inch felt wad 1 1/8 #7 1/2 and another .125 overshot card wad.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,741 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 ·
You need to lessen the drag on your line, However the cast was in an excellent spot
Tron is so much better at it. I knew a troll years ago on a Vietnam vet list. He was so good at it that he even put tron to shame. He started a thread titled " It's the GUNS Stupid " cross-posted to - I don't know how many - other groups and it drew thousands of hot retorts. Guy called himself !Jones ( Not Jones ) and was a college professor ex Vietnam vet teaching computer science it TAMU Corpus Christie. He retired a few years ago but still trolls the usenet groups.

See; https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q="+it's+the+guns+stupid+"+usenet

If the 'guns' troll wasn't the longest running troll in usenet history it has to be damn close. Jonesy was a good guy most of the time but he was, essentially, a troll. And good at it. He could stir up the calmest person and make them reply.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,741 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
Here is just some of Jones' work product.

!Jones <[email protected]>


````````````````````````````````````````````````````


On Nov 17, 1:01 pm, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
< [email protected]> wrote:

!Jones <[email protected]> wrote innews:[email protected]:

Quote:

It has been my experience that inserting my comments into and
distributed across the body of text to which I am replying tends
to yield a poorly written essay; I take writing seriously.

//Quote://

Well, there's your problem, dumbass. You're not writing essays.
You're posting to usenet. This is a public, bi-directional
communications medium. Bi-directional means that multiple people
participate. And that means that there are different conventions
than in a unidirectional medium [blah blah blah]

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
You did not read carefully, did you, my child?

My response was to another person who was screaming at me for not
fitting his mold. I notice that, in order to find "my problem", you
had to snip the last sentence, which read: "I do not, however, demand
that you do likewise," which means: "Post any damn way you please; *I*
jolly well will!"

May I suggest that you're seriously misinformed about Usenet if you
think it's bi-directional. Usenet is pretty much a broadcast medium.
I send my postings to a server and they simply propagate according to
a split horizon algorithm. NNTP actually predates TCP/IP; although,
it has now been rolled into that suite... Usenet is about as bi-
directional as two deaf, blind people screaming in a completely dark
room; there is no directional connection whatsoever.

But, hey! As you mentioned, Usenet is full of "wanking retards", so
I'm pretty well unsurprised when people haven't a clue how it works.
I dunno... go read a book on it or something.

Jones
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
22,741 Posts
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
More from !Jones,

!Jones
View attachment 317263
5/9/01


Other recipients:


The King Ranch in Texas... at three quarters of a million acres, it's
larger than some of the smaller states; if you stretched out all of
its fencing, it would reach from deep south Texas to Boston, MA. It's
hard to grasp that kind of an area... it's bigger than your average
third world country.

As you approach the gate, you see a sign conspicuously displayed (as
required by Texas law). It says: "concealed carry of firearms on this
property prohibited... yada yada yada..." I wonder why they would do
that?

So, here they are: the largest ranch in the world prohibits firearms
on all of its three quarters of a million acres, and yet, the gun nuts
want to bully some poor slob at the corner grocery store for not
wanting guns in his business. Hey, barrel-suckers! Do you list the
King Ranch as one of the businesses that all gun owners should
boycott? (Not hardly! They'll take your little web page down as soon
as it contains their name; they have plenty of lawyers to do it, too.)

Well, here is your target, guys. If the King Ranch of (by God) Texas
doesn't want y'all lugging your hardware over a significant portion of
the the largest inhabited state's geography (and has the legal and
political clout to make it stick), then I really don't want you
fanatics carrying in the produce isle of my local super market,
either. When you can convince the King Ranch to remove their signs,
then I'll say that you've accomplished something. Until then, lay off
of the poor retailers. It's always easy to pick on the little guy who
really doesn't want to be in the center of the issue... Hey! Impress
the shit outta me and try putting the King Ranch on your web page.
Well, maybe you'd better not because I promise you they'll have it
pulled off of the web in a day. Maybe you'd better stick to the
corner stores, what?

And, with that... I'm off to Mexico!

Jones
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Top