Trapshooters Forum banner

1 - 15 of 15 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,023 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Smart weapons will need a 'security device' to prevent unauthorized use.

Federal authorities have just released a set of recommended guidelines to define the minimum technical requirements that law enforcement agencies expect from smart guns. The proposed baseline specs cover just pistols for now, and are open for public input from now till September 13.

The biggest difference that the proposed smart gun would have from regular firearms is the addition of a so-called "security device." This is designed to prevent unauthorized use by disabling the firing system unless when in control of identified users, and has to meet an exhaustive list of requirements (at least, in this draft proposal).

The security device is to be a permanent part of the pistol, but can include externally worn items such as rings, wristbands or tokens. More than one person can be programmed to operate the gun, and the security device must not alter the normal operation of grasping and firing the pistol, nor increase the time needed to grab, draw from a holster and fire the weapon.

If electromagnetic interference may affect the security device, countermeasure detection tech must also be installed to allow the user to fire the gun "when an attempt to block the authorization process is detected."

The security device must covertly inform the operator when the gun is ready to fire, and if it uses batteries, the batteries may be rechargeable, but must be replaceable. And if power is running low, the security device must warn the user with sufficient time to safely take action. Finally, if the security device malfunctions, it must default to a state to allow the pistol to fire, and should be designed to be easy to reset or disengage in such cases.

Although the proposed requirements seem pretty comprehensive, plenty of loopholes could arise, especially in case of interference or malfunction. This is why the public input stage is important, and the NIJ is soliciting input from people ranging from advocates and academics to entrepreneurs.

In August, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) will hold a two-day "convening of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies" to review and discuss the proposed specs. After that, the Department of Justic and Department of Homeland Security will revise the guidelines before finalizing the document for publication.

After publication, the specs are meant to provide guidance to the private industry for manufacturers to develop weapons that meet law enforcers' needs. The document is not a mandate that individuals or law enforcement agencies must use the new technology when it's developed. Still, it's nice to see the authorities make strides towards President Obama's goal of developing advanced gun safety technology.

US government releases proposed guidelines for smart guns
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,596 Posts
Finally, if the security device malfunctions, it must default to a state to allow the pistol to fire, and should be designed to be easy to reset or disengage in such cases.
And if the device malfunctions, who is to say that the nature of the malfunction will not disallow this default?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,023 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
And if the device malfunctions, who is to say that the nature of the malfunction will not disallow this default?
Because there calling it a Loophole, in that they don't want it to default to dumb mode, they don't want it to work, period, if the smart part fails.

Would you want a mandated smart gun that doesn't work if the smart part fails and it's 2am and a bad guy is banging down the door?

And, you do know, in some states they will mandate and eventually all dumb guns will be outlawed.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,596 Posts
Because there calling it a Loophole, in that they don't want it to default to dumb mode, they don't want it to work, period, if the smart part fails.

Would you want a mandated smart gun that doesn't work if the smart part fails and it's 2am and a bad guy is banging down the door?

And, you do know, in some states they will mandate and eventually all dumb guns will be outlawed.
Exactly my point.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
8,492 Posts
Then they could control your gun over satellite. Who they trying to bullshit. That falls under the invasion of privacy.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
8,492 Posts
These senators, congressman better start getting their manure together or a mob is going to show up at their door with a noose.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,989 Posts
Personally, I don't trust most of the current technology available...including the computer that I'm currently using to type this message.

There's no way in life I would ever agree with an idea like this...idiotic!!!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,006 Posts
Yes, let big government do this such a sterling success rate like all their other endeavors have worked out so well. I don't foresee any problems at all. Fricken micromanaging, don't take a dump without our permission nothing better to do than harass it's citizens jerks how bout fixing something needind real fixing, like say the 20 trillion national dept you keep adding to. Just keep wagging the dog till it all blows up.
Aloha
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
32 Posts
Well it would likely be Bluetooth or rfid (most likely) and neither is secure. So I wonder if they're considering multi-factor authentication.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,562 Posts
People like Obama looking down the road to total chaos that they have created when the financial sector completely fails. There is ONLY ONE reason all these government agencies have been armed as they have during the last two admins. 20 trillion reason's tells me I am right. They want to shut any gun down on the spot.....not there yet but its coming.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,390 Posts
Smart Gun......
Hits it's intended target every time.

End of story.
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Top