Love it...That is an awesome way to illustrate the results.This fixed choke barrel has a 4" choke section and shoots winning scores front to back. View attachment 1866291
Love it...That is an awesome way to illustrate the results.This fixed choke barrel has a 4" choke section and shoots winning scores front to back. View attachment 1866291
The interior barrel profile and quality of shot is what makes good patterns.So essentially it is a choke reaming job?
More refined than that in that the back bore is adjusted, forcing cone lengthened if needed and choke constriction done to match the associated back bore. Note how @Ram Rod choke section is illustrated. The constriction is adjusted to max pattern gradually until its where needed over a range of the barrel. Herb Orre was onto the idea years ago but his approach was not as refined. I have a Model 12 with a Herb Orre choke and it looks much like the Wilkinson pattern.So essentially it is a choke reaming job?
That's a lot of olympic medals!More of a full length Sunnen honing job, I doubt Tom "reams" anything. What you get are mirror polished bores with a bore/choke profile that performs. Of course Neal Winston and Tim state it doesn't matter..... but the list of All Americans/AAA shooters with averages higher than Neal or Tim's high scores whom are believers in Tom's work might speak to the fact that Tom provides a valued service.
Tom can influence the choke to raise, lower or horizontally move the pattern if your barrel doesn't shoot straight. He will also tell you if your barrel isn't worth spending money on. I trust him completely.
I squaded several times with Leo at the Great lakes Grand after a couple of clinics with him.Wilkinson has been the "go to" guy for barrel work for decades. Money well spent! You'll get a lot of opinions on TS.com about choke constriction but as you touched on earlier, it's what feels best to you as far as your hits are concerned. Put in the work, practice a lot from the 27 with your chokes, gauge your hits, and you will come up with the choke solution that you feel gives you the best consistency. Then never doubt yourself. I had a choke tube manufacturer experiment with different internal configurations and constrictions for me that I used on my Kolar. I settled on a .027 choke that I used for both 27 yard and singles. Worked for me. I had the pleasure of shooting with Leo III quite a few times and did his recoil pad work on his DT10. He used a .035 choke for handicap (top single barrel) and not much more open for singles (top barrel of the O/U). I asked him about his choke choices and he said he liked a "hot core" for his pattern. Well, he could put that "hot core" on the target much better than most of the rest of us------------! So, your mileage may vary. Having the Wilkinson tuned barrels is a good step forward.
Fred....let's talk.Had Wilkinson do my barrels and chokes. K-80 Trap Special with chokes tuned to match the barrel. Three chokes (.35, .25 and .15) at 33 yards (why 33?....it was as far back as I could get given where the board is and a fence. So I really was at the 'back fence'). I wish I still had the pictures from before the work, but do not. Yes, I shoot a high gun, that is not the issue...it is how even the patterns are. Before I had clumps and holes, not many strays now. Quite an improvement in my opinion. I am a believer. I would note that felt recoil is less than before. Will not discuss the cost.
Top picture on the left = .35
Top picture on the right = .25
Bottom picture on the left = .15
Bottom picture on the right = .35 left and .15 on the right. (Funny note, in this picture check out the big dent on the far left...someone shot the pattern board with a slug last year. This is half inch thick steel and it not only dented it but impressed the steel inward for 6" around the impact point)
Which of these patterns do you like best for say... singles then handicap? I'm at 27 yards. For me the .35 most likely for both singles and handicap. My brain registers smoke on a single better with what to do than a target just vaporizing or breaking into 5 pieces. For some I shoot with they want to play the percentages like baseball. Bigger pattern = higher singles scores. Any break is a dead bird. I would argue that wide patterns won't work as well at 27 yards.
Edit...this is 455 grains (shade over 1 oz.) of #8 shot with 19.4 grains of Green Dot in a Federal paper.
Do any of those people you mentioned do testing like this? No. They don't. Neil did.but the list of All Americans/AAA shooters with averages higher than Neal or Tim's high scores whom are believers in Tom's work might speak to the fact that Tom provides a valued service.
You mean he actually uses numbers and stats instead of "reading the tea leaves" or some other voodoo? Seriously though, he is very good at what he does. If I'm not mistaken, if you buy a Silver Seitz with choke tubes, Tom Wilkinson put them in, unless this has changed.You don't have to get "caught up" because Wilkinson uses % in a 30" circle to evaluate the performance of his work.
He didn't choke your gun by guessing.
Yes he uses the 40 yard pellets inside a 30 inch circle method.You mean he actually uses numbers and stats instead of "reading the tea leaves" or some other voodoo? Seriously though, he is very good at what he does. If I'm not mistaken, if you buy a Silver Seitz with choke tubes, Tom Wilkinson put them in, unless this has changed.
10 Weeks currently.Yes he uses the 40 yard pellets inside a 30 inch circle method.
He stays several weeks behind.
Yes I should have phrased that properly. Honing like you would do with an engines cylinders.More of a full length Sunnen honing job, I doubt Tom "reams" anything. What you get are mirror polished bores with a bore/choke profile that performs. Of course Neal Winston and Tim state it doesn't matter..... but the list of All Americans/AAA shooters with averages higher than Neal or Tim's high scores whom are believers in Tom's work might speak to the fact that Tom provides a valued service.
Tom can influence the choke to raise, lower or horizontally move the pattern if your barrel doesn't shoot straight. He will also tell you if your barrel isn't worth spending money on. I trust him completely.
Neil felt an overwhelming urge to have people believe as he believed...... and would spend innumerable hours making data and charts presentable to support his beliefs. All good, the man was bright and was very charismatic. A pleasure to argue with, he indeed had a following. You as an engineer know you can make any data set sing whatever chorus you want, data manipulation is how many engineers support their careers and how bridges are built that fall down. I am not accusing, just a fact of life.Do any of those people you mentioned do testing like this? No. They don't. Neil did.