Trapshooters Forum banner

1 - 20 of 20 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
29,248 Posts
Kinda sloppy wording I think. I would say "it is fake." Should be no probably to it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
454 Posts
Wiki has never been found to have published fraudulent information. That is why there is so much credence given to them, unlike the Nat'l Enquirer story about Ted Cruz's dad.

She knows she's a had crook so she has to try to pacify her ignorant, kook-aid drinking, socialist minions. If it were anyone else, we'd be asking where said person was now, since no one has ever seen them again.

God help us all.

Floyd T.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
9,042 Posts
I think the "Whooper" is wearing thin. I think people are starting to become educated to the rhetoric. The panic brought on so much rhetoric, that even if anything was proven to be true, no one would believe it.

Kind of like faking you are drowning so the life guard keeps jumping in to save you. Sooner or later you drown from your own scheme when you could really use them.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
9,042 Posts
Can they be altered?

Another thing, why is it always we have to hear interpretation of what is in these emails. Why can't they publish them for all to read, along with every part of the conversation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: midalake

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,406 Posts
Discussion Starter #12
Wiki is not third party because it is not wiki saying or writing what the emails said.

It is the emails themselves. Not heresay.

It would be like providing a handwritten letter as evidence or written testimony with an electronic signature.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
454 Posts
If ANY of these emails were false, or made up/altered, Hillary and her lynch mob would have sued Wiki long before now. She has no defense for them, so she either ignores them or plays the "...poor pitiful me, they are after me because I am just trying to help the Country..." bullchit!

Wiki has NEVER, in 10 years I believe, been proven to have bad info. They release the actual documents, as originals. The "lemmings" just choose to blow it off as inaccurate or lies. This woman has done so much corrupt BS, it is tiring to hear it all.

She will however, become the next president, and nothing will ever happen to her. Sad, sad times we live in.

Floyd T.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,735 Posts
Third party hands...could never be used in a court of law..........Hearsay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GS
Tis easy. These were all Google email accounts that were hacked. To prove authentic is not hard in court. A subpoena to the proper person(s) at Google would solve that problem.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,288 Posts
Tis easy. These were all Google email accounts that were hacked. To prove authentic is not hard in court. A subpoena to the proper person(s) at Google would solve that problem.
OH OK So all our rights to privacy are surrendered?..........Got it.............

GS
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,735 Posts
With a subpoena to testify of course. That's the way our legal system works.
Much like the way the police can break into your home without your permission if they have the proper warrant.

All I was saying is that if there were anything in any of the wikileaks that the FBI wanted to use as evidence they could easily prove them to be legit.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29,248 Posts
Good explanation here from wilileaks why emails are not subject to privacy laws or hard to enforce.

"Email has to go through potentially untrusted intermediate computers (email servers, ISPs) before reaching its destination, and there is no way to tell if it was accessed by an unauthorized entity. This is different from a letter sealed in an envelope, where by close inspection of the envelope, it might be possible to tell if someone opened it. In that sense, an email is much like a postcard whose contents are visible to everyone who handles it."

Also you have the added factor of all cc parties t any email and those forwarded. If Hillary's maid saw content of an email and testified to it's content and was told to retrieve it, that is not heresay, it is testimony to hard evidence and that is what it is. If you do not want emails made public use a letter, envelope and postage, then hope the addressee does not share it with someone.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,585 Posts
Middy, Yes, all our national security rights have been surrendered by Hillary the Idiot. Can you imagine the blackmailing that can now happen?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,735 Posts
Hey Middy, hearing through the grape vine, Comey closed the Email investigation because it was just more of the same the DOJ already shot down previously. Instead he closed that investigation so the hundred or so agents could be moved over to the Clinton Foundation investigation.

Just messing with ya. :)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,996 Posts
Just ask the village idiot to read the EULA for G-mail accounts.

You retain no right of privacy in any way, shape, or form when you agree to Google's Terms of Use.

EDIT - I know he is too lazy or stupid to look it up on his own...

"When you upload, submit, store, send or receive content to or through our Services, you give Google (and those we work with) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (such as those resulting from translations, adaptations or other changes we make so that your content works better with our Services), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content. "
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Top