Joined
·
10,122 Posts
Hello:
Recently, I had a thread on here mentioning that I purchased a used 870 field grade 870 with a 28" field grade choke tube barrel on it.
I stated that I never had a choke tube barrel before and I was anxious to pattern the tubes and shoot a few rounds of singles and 24 yard handicap with this barrel.
The barrel came with Rem chokes, included were a Full, mod, and imp cyl choke tubes. When I patterned this barrel the Mod tube from 40 yards patterned 20% above my line of sight that I was shooting at, and 80% below my line of sight.
The full choke tube patterned at the same distance patterned 30% above the line of sight and 70% below.
Let me first say that I am not a hunter as I am not familar with field barrels or choke tubes. Regardless, how can any one person shoot at any type of target with choke tubes that shoot below the line of site?
I took my 870 tb out and tried both tubes on a 16 yard practice round and I had to shoot well above the target to hit them. The full choke tube made smoke balls but I could never shoot like that.
I than purchased a Carlson .700 full choke tube and when I patterned it from 40 yards the Remington field barrel shot pattern was dead center and the entire pattern was above my line of sight, and no shot patterned below my line of sight.
I then shot a 16 yard practice round and ink balled targets with my front bead touching the bottom of the target. Now, I will be the first to admit that I don't know much about choke tubes. My patterning was done with a rest, and this patterning session was quickly done and far from being scientific.
Here are my questions, does Remington's field grade barrels have different choke tubes than their trap barrels? Also, how does Remington expect anyone to hit what they are shooting at if their field barrel choke tubes shoot below the line of sight?
I have been a big fan of Remington shotguns and products over the years, but the choke tubes from this field barrel forced me to purchase another brand choke tube.
What do you think?
Steve Balistreri
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
Recently, I had a thread on here mentioning that I purchased a used 870 field grade 870 with a 28" field grade choke tube barrel on it.
I stated that I never had a choke tube barrel before and I was anxious to pattern the tubes and shoot a few rounds of singles and 24 yard handicap with this barrel.
The barrel came with Rem chokes, included were a Full, mod, and imp cyl choke tubes. When I patterned this barrel the Mod tube from 40 yards patterned 20% above my line of sight that I was shooting at, and 80% below my line of sight.
The full choke tube patterned at the same distance patterned 30% above the line of sight and 70% below.
Let me first say that I am not a hunter as I am not familar with field barrels or choke tubes. Regardless, how can any one person shoot at any type of target with choke tubes that shoot below the line of site?
I took my 870 tb out and tried both tubes on a 16 yard practice round and I had to shoot well above the target to hit them. The full choke tube made smoke balls but I could never shoot like that.
I than purchased a Carlson .700 full choke tube and when I patterned it from 40 yards the Remington field barrel shot pattern was dead center and the entire pattern was above my line of sight, and no shot patterned below my line of sight.
I then shot a 16 yard practice round and ink balled targets with my front bead touching the bottom of the target. Now, I will be the first to admit that I don't know much about choke tubes. My patterning was done with a rest, and this patterning session was quickly done and far from being scientific.
Here are my questions, does Remington's field grade barrels have different choke tubes than their trap barrels? Also, how does Remington expect anyone to hit what they are shooting at if their field barrel choke tubes shoot below the line of sight?
I have been a big fan of Remington shotguns and products over the years, but the choke tubes from this field barrel forced me to purchase another brand choke tube.
What do you think?
Steve Balistreri
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin