Trapshooters Forum banner

1 - 19 of 19 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
177 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is PERCEIVED as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.”
? Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,277 Posts
Of course, national socialism.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
18,856 Posts
Well, now you know where he got it from. Seig Heil!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
923 Posts
I believe he got his speech mannerisms from Adolph. Look at the staccato delivery, looking down with an arrogant sneer, etc. Sort of scary. IMHO Ron
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,940 Posts
Though I feel no sympathy for this phony, he was guided by a real hodgepodge of ideological misfits starting with his father.

Frank Marshall Davis....Communist

Tom Ayers....Socialist

Bill Ayers... Terrorist

Jeremiah Wright....Pastor?

Alan Egan....Argentinian Marxist Prof

Larry Caldwell....Prof

Larry Goldyn...Prof

Roger Boesche...Marxist zealot Prof

Edward Said....Prof

Derrick Bell...Prof

Alice Palmer...Commy

Van Jones...Commy

David Axelrod...Flim Flam Man (Lonesome Roads clone)

Valerie Jarrett...Commy

George Soros...Commy

Saul Alinsky...Commy

The two that are very prominent in Obama's revolution against the American people are married professors from Columbia University, Richard Cloward & Frances Fox Piven.



Cloward–Piven strategy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty". Cloward and Piven were a married couple who were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in liberal[1] magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty".[2]

The two stated that many Americans who were eligible for welfare were not receiving benefits, and that a welfare enrollment drive would strain local budgets, precipitating a crisis at the state and local levels that would be a wake-up call for the federal government, particularly the Democratic Party. There would also be side consequences of this strategy, according to Cloward and Piven. These would include: easing the plight of the poor in the short-term (through their participation in the welfare system); shoring up support for the national Democratic Party then-splintered by pluralistic interests (through its cultivation of poor and minority constituencies by implementing a national "solution" to poverty); and relieving local governments of the financially and politically onerous burdens of public welfare (through a national "solution" to poverty)[citation needed].


The strategy:

Cloward and Piven’s article is focused on forcing the Democratic Party, which in 1966 controlled the presidency and both houses of the United States Congress, to take federal action to help the poor. They stated that full enrollment of those eligible for welfare “would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments” that would “deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas.”[3] They wrote:

“ The ultimate objective of this strategy—to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income—will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.[3] ”

Michael Reisch and Janice Andrews wrote that Cloward and Piven "proposed to create a crisis in the current welfare system – by exploiting the gap between welfare law and practice – that would ultimately bring about its collapse and replace it with a system of guaranteed annual income. They hoped to accomplish this end by informing the poor of their rights to welfare assistance, encouraging them to apply for benefits and, in effect, overloading an already overburdened bureaucracy."[4]









remdog1187_2009_0104500.jpg

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,940 Posts
RB,

Correct. Mothers have a great deal of influence on their sons. She was the one that bore him and primarily raised him to become what he is. In my opinion another breeder that shouldn't have. How many other potential Obama mothers are out there? Scary thought.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,398 Posts
Remember Bill Clinton, everything he wanted was promoted through crocodile tears and a cry for "let's do it for the children".
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,277 Posts
Bisi, don't forget "if it saves just one life it's worth it". We still have an anti-gun liberal here who keeps spewing that nonsense.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,398 Posts
Just an FYI for everybody. I would be careful comparing Hitler to Obama. I have read where Hitler's relatives don't like having their Adolph compared to Obama, and are considering filing defamation of character lawsuits against those who persist in comparing the two.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
264 Posts
Don't be so hard on Mussolini, remember he was a newspaper editor before he became dictator which explains a lot. And as dictator he led his country to a magnificent military victory over Ethiopia, thereby proving that Italian tanks and airplanes were actually superior to Ethiopian spears and shields. But not by much. I must say that he looked a lot better hanging upside down in the gas station than he did right side up.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,525 Posts
> > How to create a social state, by
> > Saul Alinsky.
> >
> > There are 8 levels of control that
> > must be obtained before you are able to
> > create a social state. The first is the
> > most important.
> >
> > 1) Healthcare *** Control healthcare and
> > you control the people.
> > 2) Poverty *** Increase the Poverty level
> > as high as possible. Poor people are
> > easier to control and will not fight back
> > if you are providing everything for them
> > to live.
> > 3) Debt *** Increase the debt to
> > an unsustainable level. That way you are
> > able to increase taxes, and this
> > will produce more poverty.
> > 4) Gun Control *** Remove the ability to
> > defend themselves from the Government.
> > That way you are able to create a police
> > state.
> > 5) Welfare *** Take control of
> > every aspect of their lives (Food,
> > Housing, and Income)
> > 6) Education *** Take control of
> > what people read and listen to *** take
> > control of what children learn in school.
> > 7) Religion *** Remove the belief in the
> > God from the Government and schools.
> > 8) Class Warfare *** Divide the
> > people into the wealthy and the poor. This
> > will cause more discontent and it will
> > be easier to take from (Tax) the wealthy
> > with the support of the poor.

> > Does any of this sound like what is
> > happening to the United States ?
> >
 
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
Top