Trapshooters Forum banner

1 - 13 of 13 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,277 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Liberalism

Liberalism's Impact on Moral Character

http://flfamily.org/family/liberalisms-impact-on-moral-character/

Dennis Prager

"While liberals are certain about the moral superiority of liberal policies, the truth is that those policies actually diminish a society's moral character. Many individual liberals are fine people, but the policies they advocate tend to make a people worse. Here are 10 reasons:

1. The bigger the government, the less the citizens do for one another. If the state will take care of me and my neighbors, why should I? This is why Western Europeans, people who have lived in welfare states far longer than Americans have, give less to charity and volunteer less time to others than do Americans of the same socioeconomic status.

The greatest description of American civilization was written in the early 19th century by the Frenchman Alexis de Tocqueville. One of the differences distinguishing Americans from Europeans that he most marveled at was how much Americans -- through myriad associations -- took care of one another. Until President Franklin Roosevelt began the seemingly inexorable movement of America toward the European welfare state -- vastly expanded later by other Democratic presidents -- Americans took responsibility for one another and for themselves far more than they do today. Churches, Rotary Clubs, free-loan societies and other voluntary associations were ubiquitous. As the state grew, however, all these associations declined. In Western Europe, they have virtually all disappeared.

2. The welfare state, though often well intended, is nevertheless a Ponzi scheme. Conservatives have known this for generations. But now, any honest person must acknowledge it. The welfare state is predicated on collecting money from today's workers in order to pay for those who paid in before them. But today's workers don't have enough money to sustain the scheme, and there are too few of them to do so. As a result, virtually every welfare state in Europe, and many American states, like California, are going broke.

3. Citizens of liberal welfare states become increasingly narcissistic.The great preoccupations of vast numbers of Brits, Frenchmen, Germans and other Western Europeans are how much vacation time they will have and how early they can retire and be supported by the state.

4. The liberal welfare state makes people disdain work. Americans work considerably harder than Western Europeans, and contrary to liberal thought since Karl Marx, work builds character.

5. Nothing more guarantees the erosion of character than getting something for nothing. In the liberal welfare state, one develops an entitlement mentality -- another expression of narcissism. And the rhetoric of liberalism -- labeling each new entitlement a "right" -- reinforces this sense of entitlement.

6. The bigger the government, the more the corruption. As the famous truism goes, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Of course, big businesses are also often corrupt. But they are eventually caught or go out of business. The government cannot go out of business. And unlike corrupt governments, corrupt businesses cannot print money and thereby devalue a nation's currency, and they cannot arrest you.

7. The welfare state corrupts family life. Even many Democrats have acknowledged the destructive consequences of the welfare state on the underclass. It has rendered vast numbers of males unnecessary to females, who have looked to the state to support them and their children (and the more children, the more state support) rather than to husbands. In effect, these women took the state as their husband.

8. The welfare state inhibits the maturation of its young citizens into responsible adults. As regards men specifically, I was raised, as were all generations of American men before me, to aspire to work hard in order to marry and support a wife and children. No more. One of the reasons many single women lament the prevalence of boy-men -- men who have not grown up -- is that the liberal state has told men they don't have to support anybody. They are free to remain boys for as long as they want.

And here is an example regarding both sexes. The loudest and most sustained applause I ever heard was that of college students responding to a speech by President Barack Obama informing them that they would now be covered by their parents' health insurance policies until age 26.

9. As a result of the left's sympathetic views of pacifism and because almost no welfare state can afford a strong military, European countries rely on America to fight the world's evils and even to defend them.

10. The leftist weltanschauung [worldview] sees society's and the world's great battle as between rich and poor rather than between good and evil. Equality therefore trumps morality. This is what produces themorally confused liberal elites that can venerate a Cuban tyranny with its egalitarian society over a free and decent America that has greater inequality.

None of this matters to progressives. Against all this destructiveness, they will respond not with arguments to refute these consequences of the liberal welfare state, but by citing the terms "social justice" and "compassion," and by labeling their opponents "selfish" and worse.

If you want to feel good, liberalism is awesome. If you want to do good, it is largely awful." -- Dennis Prager
 

·
Molon Labe
Joined
·
11,993 Posts
That is exactly the way it is
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,399 Posts
Talk of budget cuts to the military are always at the liberal forefront. Why is it the welfare status is never in such discussion? The article above explains it. Jake
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
18,864 Posts
Good post. Charlie
 

·
Molon Labe
Joined
·
11,993 Posts
Jake it is the same way with Social Security, the always talk about running out of money to pay the people who paid into it but they never talk about running out of welfare money for the people who never put in a dime
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,277 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
Setterman, who is the author of that quote?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,694 Posts
After listening to an old conservative pastor give a sermon on how today's "tolerance" and "diversity" has been used for an excuse to deteriorate/ undermine our morals and ethics. I came to that conclusion.

It became apparent that it is difficult, if not impossible for morals and ethics to survive when tolerance and diversity are implemented.

Work ethics, honesty, the gay/lesbian issue, illegal aliens, and social greed or redistribution are all good examples. Morals and ethics lead us to strive to help our fellow man in a voluntary manner, but diversity and tolerance are more associated with forced social engineering, and now politically based.

As a country, are we losing our moral/ethic base, and leaning more toward diversity and tolerance?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,622 Posts
Written by Dennis Prager.

Wiki sez:

Dennis Prager (born August 2, 1948) is an American nationally syndicated radio talk show host, syndicated columnist, author, and public speaker. He is noted for his conservative political and social views grounded in "Judeo-Christian" values.[1] He holds that there is an "American Trinity" of essential principles, which he lists as E Pluribus Unum, In God We Trust, and Liberty.

Link to his site above.

HM
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,517 Posts
Interesting thing about Prager: He studied to be a Rabbi and completed his studies, but took a different course. Thing I like about him, although I disagree with many of his views, is that he will entertain other views in a calm discourse.

However, I do think that one of the major problems we entertain is a great and hateful divide between the two parties. This didn't used to be the case. Let's face it, Dems. and Repubs. will likely both be here long after we are all gone, but lack of discourse and lack of joint problem solving is hardly good for moving the country forward. I wish Prager would discuss that impediement, I bet he could, if he has not, input some valuable suggestions. He strikes me as honest, ethical, sincere, and calm.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,566 Posts
Very interesting essay.

I would only differ in that a lapse in moral character is what is necessary for liberalism to breed.

Best, Dennis
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top