Rick,
I am sure you will be proud to note that I have added "class clown" to the list of insults you have directed at me.
The complete list of names you have called me is as follows:dumb, a loon, a moron, coward, brain washed, feeble minded, mentally ill, believes in perverse and unnatural laws and hinted that I am a "liberal" (the ultimate insult on this site), a Communist and dim witted, lunacy and loser, jerk, class clown. You are on a roll although I would point out that several of your insults are redundant, dumb, feeble minded, dim witted, lunacy.
If I have missed any, please let me know.
While it continuous to be tedious to remind you, I will: "by registering for this site, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-explicit, hateful, threatening, or otherwise in bad taste in an open public forum."
Try keeping your word at least to the moderators. I know it's hard for you.
SF SGM:
Thank you for a reasoned response.
1. I do know that Tories were killed during the American Revolution. I don't think it was GW's or the revolutionary government's policy. As far as i have read these acts of violence were done by what now might be called vigilantes. Hardly the same a leading an army to kill Americans.
2. i do know that Lee and other officers of the Confederacy did officially resign their commissions. Under the circumstances, it was the right thing to do but it is hard to deny that it mightily contributed to the number of American deaths. That has been my point all along.
3. I have never read anything that describes a meeting by Lincoln or Seward during which they pledged not to reinforce Fort Sumpter. Please publish some reference. I certainly know about the February 1861 peace convention, but I don't think that is what you are talking about. Is it?
4. I would suggest that Arlington became "hallowed ground" the first time any Civil War dead were buried there. I will take you word for it that the Federal government used the non-payment of taxes as a justifications for the seizure. Considering the level of anger in the North about the assassination and the wide spread, although unproven and probably not true, belief that the leaders of the Confederacy were part of an assassination conspiracy to kill Lincoln, i can easily understand why Arlington would have been taken.
I still think it was magnanimous for Lincoln to let almost all of the Confederate army to just go home. With the exception of the Confederate prison camp directors, that's what happened.
5. Clearly Lee didn't think he had a responsibility to the Union. I can understand his torn loyalties. I still believe the honorable thing for him to do was stay out of it. I don't think it is reasonable to compare Lee's decision to that of those officers that stayed loyal to the Union. They didn't have to break any oaths.
Yes, Lincoln was a politician and a darn good one. Unfortunately, the label, at least in our time has become an insult. It wasn't always. And yes, he broke the law of Habeus Corpus.
Without Lincoln it is unlikely there would be a United States. More likely there would be 48 individual countries. As you have correctly suggested, people did not so much think of themselves as Americans; more Virginians, Georgians, etc. Think Europe. If the policy of voluntary secession had been accepted, you can be sure that other States, both North and South would inevitably have had their own grievances with a central government and voted to go their own way.
While it is not quite germane to your comments, you might do some research on the SCOTUS's decision about whether States had the legal right to secede. Texas vs White, 1869.
We sure could use more Lincoln's today. Can we agree on that?