They work great for me. I have them on 3 guns. They provide good recoil absorption for the money. Plus you don’t have to modify the stock to install one.

 

In the "Search Community" box above type falconstrike and read to your heart's content.

 

Well, if they put a modern design attachment to their pad instead of an archaic pronounced toe.
No, you can’t buff the toe off.

 

Very positive. I put one on last year and it does reduce recoil. It will add a little to your LOP though. I replaced the old, rock hard, and slippery OEM pad on my Browning Ultra Plus (mid-90s mfg) and it worked great. I put on the universal mount pad but still had to drill a new screw hole in the butt stock, to mount the plate. No biggie.

 

I recently put the universal on my 1-touch and it noticeably did reduce the felt recoil. The downside is it did increase the LOP as i am unwilling to cut my stock.

 

I have 3 and really like them. They increased the LOP like others mentioned but I need that anyway. Have recommended them to others and they like theirs also.

 

They work fine, much better than a standard recoiled pad, but obviously no where near the recoil reduction of a ProSoft, PFS, Stocklock or Wenig Recoil System. If you have a nice wood stock that fits you moderately well, a Falcon Strike is a good option - especially if you don’t want to cut up your stock to modify it for a dedicated recoil reducer like Soft Touch or the like.

 

I had several of them. I found the recoil reduction maybe slightly better than a Limbsaver Airtech which also doesn't have the added length and weight. They are shaped the same also.

 

Thanks for the feed back, I will give them a try.

 

I’m curious too. Thanks for the post