OK, Ed, I both understand and agree with your POI test at 10 yards; the gun probably did shoot very high at singles distances when set up by the Peruzzi book. You just have to check to make sure, that's all, and you did.
You wrote "Next I never said I was raising the POI up, what I'm doing is changing where I look by moving the stock up or down."
Well, that's OK too though I generally think the effect of moving the stock up is that the POI is raised. But I do see that was not your intent.
"Where did you get the 6 inch figure when you said that seemed like a lot...?"
Here's how I got that 6-inch figure.
We will start by estimating the distance the POI is raised at 40 yards by moving the comb N inches.
Let's say the distance from your eye to the front bead is 42 inches, 3.5 feet. (Many people use the barrel length for this calculation, but I think bead-to-eye is right, a view supported in the POI Calculator thread at the top of this section.)
and the distance to a 40-target is 36"x40 = 1440 inches.
The ratio of movement at the gun compared to at the 40-yard bird is 42:1440 or 34 to 1. So a comb rise will result in a POI rise 34 times the magnitude of the comb change. A 1/4 inch change (up) will raise the POI at the 40-yard bird by 0.25 x 34 = 8.6 inches. But you are shooting singles so it won't rise that much. Let's take 32 yards as a singles distance, multiply 8.6 times 32/40 = 6.8 inches but many take their singles closer than 32 yards so I estimated 6 inches but if you prefer 7 inches I'll not disagree.
I thought you might be "reading the breaks" to find out which way to move your comb and ended up with a rise of 1/4 inch. You substantiated that with "I keep raising the stock until I'm breaking the targets in the middle if the pieces are all pretty equal, not going up or down then you are pretty much in the middle of the target."
The problem with that is that "reading the breaks" an illusion. It certainly seems like shot centered below the bird should move the pieces up, centered above the bird should move the pieces down, but what's just wrong; that's not what really happens. You haven't been here long, but Ron Baker, others friends, and I spent a lot of 2011 and 2012 making videos of target breaks and the shot-placement that led to them and demonstrated that the popular idea, "reading breaks for information about where the center of the pattern is" is wrong. Targets break the way they do becasue they have linear and rotational inertia and that's the whole story. It has nothing at all to do with where the shot that missed them was; how could it?
Here, for example, is a series of breaks that occurred when I raised the shot-cloud stepwise from below the bird to above it. Minus 4 (on the lower right of the video) is far below the bird; zero is on it, plus 4 is far above it. As you will see, there is no reliable difference in the contrasting breaks: minus 4/plus 4, minus 3/plus 3 and so on. In all cases, the pieces mostly go up, the big pieces to the right, the small pieces to the left.
TBF_rising_POA breaks
Here's another test of low-recoil AA's. All the shots are over the bird as ou can clearly see but there is no evidence of the "pieces going down" rather than up.
See what you think.
nodomesbroken
I'll bet your POI is right for your if you are smoking the targets; you might want to go back to 10 yards to document it in case you lose confidence in it, want to change something and want to have a known system to geo back to if it doesn't work, or just want a successful baseline from which to adjust other guns you may buy.
Yours in Sport,
Neil