Trapshooters Forum banner

1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,735 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Ruling: the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms does not include, in any degree, the right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public.
Missouri joins states allowing concealed carry without permit

WOW, just WOW
How does a judge take a constitution amendment "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." and turn in a ruling that says the 2nd doesn't include IN ANY DEGREE the right to bear arms????

Did these judges not get past 4th grade? Did they not learn to read? Do they not know their history? Did they not get the news that we just elected a PRO 2nd Amendment President? How the hell can they say IN ANY DEGREE when it outright says the people have the RIGHT and it shall not be INFRINGED?

I guess this just sets up the Supreme Court for one of the first cases it will hear with the newly appointed justice Trump nominates. Probably couldn't come at a better time. But WOW, in any degree?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,991 Posts
Ninth Circuit is in Califonication.

You know what they say about the state - it's like a granola bar - take away the fruits and the nuts, all you have left are the flakes.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
18,216 Posts
The Ninth is the west coast, Guam, the Mariannas, Nevada, Idaho, and Arizona. I think Arizona wanted to get out of the Ninth, but can't.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,023 Posts
Where in the Supreme Court pass rulings did it deem the right to Concealment?

The Court held that individuals have a right to have handguns in their homes and about securing guns in the home.

Little more then that.... Look it up....

Saying that, a couple of justices have been frustrated with the other judges in not hearing gun cases that would expand gun rights . In the past several years a number of cases didn't make the docket.

I suspect with Trumps nomination (replacing a conservative with a conservative) and then having a liberal justice retire and Trump gets to nominate a second pro-gun judge the flood gates will open in regard to Gun Rights, as it would assure an almost 100% success rate.

The realities. When Justice Scalia died, shorty after a New York pro-gun group that had a case working through the courts to combat the NY SAFE ACT, withdrew the case as they thought they would lose if it went to the present court. I suspect they will resume the case once the Supreme Court is once again at full strength.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,004 Posts
The ninth circuit is boil on the backside of the western states an anti gun forever. Same guys who upheld the Hawaii ruling about not issuing a single carry permits for it's citizens except cops. Why the hell call us a may issue state, as they may issue only when donkeys fly. Comon Trump! put a Scalia on the scotus so this crap can change
Aloha
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,991 Posts
Hypothetical question...

So, Obummer pardons HilLIARy, thus taking Trumps ability to go after her off the table :-(

SOOOO The Donald goes after the forged documents of one Kenyan illegal immigrant...

Assume we then find that, low and behold a document, made using a 21st century printer and PhotoShop is in fact a false creation of a 1960's style birth certificate... Net result - he is found to be NOT eligible to have been POTUS - so eight years of legal documents go out the window .

Two interesting results.

1) HilLIARy's pardon has no effect so President Trump could go after her. :)

2) SCOTUS appointments of Kagan and Sotomayor are invalidated. Thus The Donald gets three appointments not one on the first day. :))

Food for thought.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
18,216 Posts
Wishful thinking! Could be a long shot though. Trump needs to get busy with his policies and forget the former dictatorship/regime, unless something is uncovered.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top