[jmdmt]

I'm looking for info on chokes with 1oz loads. 16yds to 27yds. I currently use
a full inv+ but was thinking about x-full/turkey ??? Haven't been able find solid info on any of this. Thanks in advance jmdmt

 

[Guest]

IM will work just fine for 1 oz loads if you do your job. If you insist, the full you've been using will do just fine.

All Good,

ec90t

 

[BILL GRILL]

Use the same thing you have been using you will see no difference, other than less recoil, money saved, better breaks, ect. Shot 1 oz all year at 16 yard best average ever, 1st and 2nd 100 straight. check out ata Wm R.

 

[TEXASZEPHYR]

Have you ever watched a smoker blow a smoke ring?
fluidics would suggest faster thru smaller might cause this phenom. If you use a longer taper in the choke you might get a better pattern (tighter hole longer taper) just food for thought

Bob

 

[SR1]

I use a LF Briley tube with 1oz loads and am very happy.

 

[Loyac]

1 0z of #8s @ 1180 fps through a 32" IM choked barrel up to the 25 yard line. A full choke beyond that. John

 

[BMC]

I am of the impression, based on my own experience, that largely 1 oz (typically faster loads) like a full choke. There have been exceptions such as I found my 870/1100 guns seemed to break better with a mod choke over a full. But with my XT and BT100, there is a very noticeable difference when I went full with the same 1oz loads. I've tried several and for me, with my gun and my 1oz loads, they prefer a tighter choke. It should also be said they are 1290 1oz, so I believe the speed has something to do with it too. I used the same full choke from the 16 as I do from the 27 and the same 1oz loads. A few weeks ago while shooting some rounds from the 27 I decided to use the bottom barrel of my XT which has an IC installed (first shot of doubles) just for kicks. I was surprised that I still hit the targets, some pretty impressively much to my surprise.