Trapshooters Forum banner
1 - 20 of 97 Posts

zamboni

· Registered
Joined
·
158 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I have not taken the time to try and figure out if different wads make a huge or significant difference in how a shell or load patterns so I thought I would throw it out to the guys that know a lot more than me.

A good trap shooting buddy is getting out of shooting for health reasons. He gave me 5 bags of Windjammer wads, which I have never used. I have used AA clone wads and have had what I feel are good results. I am curious to read responses.

Thanks
 
The windjammer will work great. The only thing you have to be careful with is making sure the petals don't fold under the shot charge . I never found a lot of difference in wad performance except the use of "Spreader wads" which will open up the pattern in a tight choked gun ( that's what they are made for) . My only caution would be to use the type wad that is made for a particular hull. Straight walled hulls like Federal work best when using wads made for straight walled hulls ,and tapered wall hulls like Winchester and Remington are best matched to wads made for tapered hulls.
 
The Patent for the WAA12 wad is from 1966. If Winchester could get the same velocity from less powder by designing a new wad they would have done it. It's pretty much the best you can get based on its design longevity. Windjammer came years afterwards. I still dont understand what problem they were trying to solve with it. I'm pretty much done monkeying around with wads.
Gun Clubs, STS, Nitro: Claybuster Fig 8 clone or Rem Fig 8
AA's in all flavors: Claybuster WAA12 clone or Win WAA12
High velocity loads with high weights of powder: Windjammer/SP12
 
They for sure make a difference when building the shell due to stack height differences. There are published loads using WAA style wads in Remington hulls but when I tried to build them, there was not enough stack height so crimps were concave. Fig 8 style wads stacked up much better.
 
I have not taken the time to try and figure out if different wads make a huge or significant difference in how a shell or load patterns so I thought I would throw it out to the guys that know a lot more than me.

A good trap shooting buddy is getting out of shooting for health reasons. He gave me 5 bags of Windjammer wads, which I have never used. I have used AA clone wads and have had what I feel are good results. I am curious to read responses.

Thanks
I've tested this a couple of times, using "8-petal" wads and comparing them to "4-petal" wads of the same design.

This is hardly conclusive, but you can draw your own inferences.

My simplistic answer is this:

What kind of wad you use is probably WAY less important than how hard your shot is. Hard shot patterns tighter. Period.


 
I just use the wad that the hull and load calls for in established data. It is not like heavy benchrest rifle where two millimeters tighter wins the trophy. Shot a hole in the sky where the target is going to be and watch it break.
One thing Trapshooters are good at, worry about EVERYTHING. Just shoot em.
 
I started using Windjammer wads 25 years ago. I shoot everything. Singles, doubles & handicap with them. I even use them for back fence, parking lot, sporting clays & long bird. As long as I do what I’m supposed to do the targets break. They pattern well & generate lower pressures than most wads which helps with handicap speed loads & recoil.
 
1 - 20 of 97 Posts