Which is better of the two ?
The Dillon is better than both.Which is better of the two ?
Not a good justification at all. The MEC has a 40-50 year head start on the RCBS The Grand. MEC also has a different market philosophy than RCBS. MEC makes half a dozen machines for all kinds of budgets, but you must pay for all repairs and parts. The Grand has only one offering that can be compared to only the manual version of the MEC 9000 but you do not pay for replacement parts. Hunters far outnumber trapshooters, so a hunter who loads a couple boxes a year can get buy with a MEC Junior and will never need a RCBS.There are hundreds of thousands of mec's out there loading shells, less than a few thousand SL900's and Grands out there combined. Call them and ask..... the majority isn't always wrong.
That is true, none are perfect. Stamped or machined, they all make a great shell. I've never crossed paths with a Grand - I hope to see one in action before I dieI am just thankful that we have access to such good equipment (nothing is perfect) we can’t go wrong with either machine. I don’t care for stamped parts but Mec loaders WORK.
Just one more opinion.
The MEC's do have a short handle stroke, and that requires more muscle. I measured the handle travel on the Dillon once and it was something like 23 inches. It's easy and you can certainly "feel" the operation, but it's a long ways from top to bottom. I think I trade one fatigue for another.The main feature the RCBS has going for it is it’s ease of operation which is less fatiguing than the MEC.