My understanding from the rule book this load is legal due to not being over 1290, but the 3 1/4 drams does that make it illegal. Thanks everybody
All that is true. So thinking along those lines, the Rem Nitro 27 that everyone speaks so highly of (and I'm not opposed to shooting a box or two myself on occasion) with a stated velocity of 1235 on the box, or the AA Super Handicap (Silver Bullets that are now grey) with a stated velocity of 1250 or the Fed Grand Handicap with the same 1250 FPS velocity, might all contain shells that are at 1325 to 1340 FPS with a 1.125 oz payload. Would be interesting to chrono a box of each of the above to see what actual velocity is for individual shells.Not to open a can of worms but...
Nobody will challenge you with this load, if it is a factory load. They will look at the label and say, "it's under 1290 fps so it's legal."
Except, in reality, it might not be.
I'm assuming these are USA-manufactured factory shells. If so, USA cartridge manufacturers voluntarily follow SAAMI guidelines.
And since SAAMI allows a +/- 90 fps tolerance on the stated muzzle velocity on the box, it is possible that there are cartridges in that box that have a 1345 fps muzzle velocity.
But nobody is likely to challenge factory shells, and furthermore, there is nothing in the rule book that tells you how you are supposed to check the muzzle velocity of a shell if a challenge is made.
So this is a long way of saying that the shells you are using may or may not actually be legal shells, but you're safe to use them.
It would never get that far. The ONLY thing the ATA could possibly test is the weight of the shot charge and the size of the pellets. And even the size of the pellets is dubious since they're never perfectly spherical..It could get litigious.
This is the one I always like to quote when people say "my gun likes 8's," or "my gun likes 7-1/2's"On target loads it allows for +/- ½ pellet size (+/- .005" dia.) of variation; a No. 8 (.090") target load could contain pellets ranging in size from No. 7 1/2 (.095") down to No. 8 1/2 (.085").
Here's what I wrote to the rules Committee:It’s been nearly 100 years since smokeless powder has been commonly used in shotguns. I say it’s time to drop the dram equivalent on all shotgun shells. It confuses many shooters and has absolutely no value today. Printing the weight of the shot and velocity is the only thing that matters.
The ATA wording pertaining to velocity is also very poorly worded. With ammo varying +/- 90 FPS it’s dumb to say no shell can exceed the limit of 1290 FPS with 1 1/8oz. of shot. Many factory shells have an average of 1235 or 1250 and the reality of the entire box being over the limit is entirely possible.
Never.when was the last time that you were at a club that actually had a certified chronograph operational to test the velocity of someones shells should there be a challenge