My understanding from the rule book this load is legal due to not being over 1290, but the 3 1/4 drams does that make it illegal. Thanks everybody
Not to open a can of worms but...My understanding from the rule book this load is legal due to not being over 1290, but the 3 1/4 drams does that make it illegal. Thanks everybody
All that is true. So thinking along those lines, the Rem Nitro 27 that everyone speaks so highly of (and I'm not opposed to shooting a box or two myself on occasion) with a stated velocity of 1235 on the box, or the AA Super Handicap (Silver Bullets that are now grey) with a stated velocity of 1250 or the Fed Grand Handicap with the same 1250 FPS velocity, might all contain shells that are at 1325 to 1340 FPS with a 1.125 oz payload. Would be interesting to chrono a box of each of the above to see what actual velocity is for individual shells.Not to open a can of worms but...
Nobody will challenge you with this load, if it is a factory load. They will look at the label and say, "it's under 1290 fps so it's legal."
Except, in reality, it might not be.
I'm assuming these are USA-manufactured factory shells. If so, USA cartridge manufacturers voluntarily follow SAAMI guidelines.
And since SAAMI allows a +/- 90 fps tolerance on the stated muzzle velocity on the box, it is possible that there are cartridges in that box that have a 1345 fps muzzle velocity.
But nobody is likely to challenge factory shells, and furthermore, there is nothing in the rule book that tells you how you are supposed to check the muzzle velocity of a shell if a challenge is made.
So this is a long way of saying that the shells you are using may or may not actually be legal shells, but you're safe to use them.
Neil, in the past, did just this. He found that the "Big 3" actually have a smaller span of +/- on the actual muzzle velocity than SAAMI allows.All that is true. So thinking along those lines, the Rem Nitro 27 that everyone speaks so highly of (and I'm not opposed to shooting a box or two myself on occasion) with a stated velocity of 1235 on the box, or the AA Super Handicap (Silver Bullets that are now grey) with a stated velocity of 1250 or the Fed Grand Handicap with the same 1250 FPS velocity, might all contain shells that are at 1325 to 1340 FPS with a 1.125 oz payload. Would be interesting to chrono a box of each of the above to see what actual velocity is for individual shells.
TrueThey could also be 90 fps slower than listed, and the ammo would still be shipped.
Also true. They follow the Chronographing standards in the SAAMI standard. (ANSI/SAAMI Z299.2, I think the current standard is 2015.) It's available on the internet if you look hard enough.Also remember that they are not using the typical chronograph that you would use for a rifle or pistol. So in reality a typical person would not be able to chronograph their own loads without sending them off somewhere.
It would never get that far. The ONLY thing the ATA could possibly test is the weight of the shot charge and the size of the pellets. And even the size of the pellets is dubious since they're never perfectly spherical..It could get litigious.
This is the one I always like to quote when people say "my gun likes 8's," or "my gun likes 7-1/2's"On target loads it allows for +/- ½ pellet size (+/- .005" dia.) of variation; a No. 8 (.090") target load could contain pellets ranging in size from No. 7 1/2 (.095") down to No. 8 1/2 (.085").
My thoughts exactly. I don't enjoy recoil that much.Why does anyone want to shoot the really hot loads anyhow? I go ouch just thinking about them.
Perceived advantage breaking long yardage handicap targets (25 yards and greater.)Why does anyone want to shoot the really hot loads anyhow? I go ouch just thinking about them.