The 725's changes are being marketed as a product improvement and the chokes are a new gimmick to stimulate sales. What the heck does Browning care if aftermarket choke manufacturers need to retool? LOL. For all we know Briley is making Browning chokes anyway, as they do the Midas ones. Is anyone baffled when Ford redesigns the F150 and the doors off last year's model don't fit? Does anyone say, "why doesn't Ford keep offering last year's model until they are sure the new one is as durable?" That's silly. Introducing a "New & Improved" product to stimulate sales (and intentionally "obsoleting" your old products) is Marketing 101.
Now, having said that, obviously when Browning rolled the dice with the goofy looking Cynergy and its original horrible trigger they couldn't risk going all-in by making it an outright replacement of the Citori. We'll see if they go all-in on this one and replace the XT. They might, because the 725 is a Citori, it is a more traditional design than the Cynergy, and it does seem to retain many of the qualities and features of the XT while streamlining the receiver at the same time.
If you're skeptical, as was I, handle one. Or better yet buy one for $2799 and try it for a season. Somewhere today a fool will probably $700 pay more than that for a 30 year-old TMX single-barrel with 80K rounds thru it, mystery barrel work, and an unreliable trigger, LOL.
-Gary