1. Attention: We have put together a thread with tips and a tutorial video to help with using the new software. Please take a moment to check out the thread here: Trapshooters.com Tutorial & Help Video.
    Dismiss Notice


Discussion in 'Uncategorized Threads' started by shadow, Nov 18, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. shadow

    shadow Active Member

    Jan 29, 1998
    Be aware of this and voice your concerns to your Senators and Congressman if you disagree.
    Date: Monday, November 17, 2008, 2:41 PM

    Windfall Tax on Retirement Income
    Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below...............

    Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You aren't going to believe this.

    Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas, it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities!

    This woman is frightening.

    She quotes..." We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest." ( I am not rich, are you)

    When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:

    "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'." (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in. Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it.
  2. recurvyarcher

    recurvyarcher Well-Known Member

    Apr 26, 2006
    This email has been going around since 2006, and it's not true. She didn't say that.
  3. claybrdr

    claybrdr Well-Known Member

    Jan 29, 1998
    I'm sure she's thinking it.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.