1. Attention: We have put together a thread with tips and a tutorial video to help with using the new software. Please take a moment to check out the thread here: Trapshooters.com Tutorial & Help Video.
    Dismiss Notice

"The Joke" is on U.S.

Discussion in 'Uncategorized Threads' started by Juno, Aug 27, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Juno

    Juno TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    635

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Bruce Specht

    Bruce Specht Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    5,059
    Location:
    Near but not in chicago
    Be afraid be very afraid this man is the evil one!
     
  3. tad houston

    tad houston TS Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2006
    Messages:
    477
    And all that is likely just the tip of the iceberg!
     
  4. 22hornet

    22hornet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,461
    Location:
    Hanford, CA
  5. Gary Waalkes

    Gary Waalkes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,402
    These strips are so so true and I certainly hope gun owners and taxpayers wake up to who this guy really is - but as shown, the media won't help with getting out the truth on him.
     
  6. bigdogtx

    bigdogtx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    10,650
    Sorry but this is NO joke. Part of our country is trying to take us down the tube. They want us to emulate Europe. Isn't that where our Founding Fathers were trying to escape from? Their economies are in the dumpster with double digit unemployment.

    Remember when we vote in November. I don't care if you have to hold your nose or get drunk, vote Republican...and not just the top of the ballot. If you want cheaper oil and decent SCOTUS justices, that is what we have to do.
     
  7. tad houston

    tad houston TS Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2006
    Messages:
    477
    Here is a post I found in a pro Obama blog by a supposed “long time Republican” on why we should ignore Obama’s limited resume….



    “He BEAT the Clinton machine. A relative newcomer, virtually unknown, stepped in and BEAT the Clintons. I don't say that in a derogatory way. Think about it. It is an amazing accomplishment. He put together an organization that beat the very best of the best...the TOP of what the Democrats have to offer.

    Did he do it by himself, this Jr. Senator? He absolutely did not. He put together a staff of brilliant, disciplined people, a TEAM. Then, he lead them to victory.

    If that is not a testament to his ability to lead this country, I don't know what it is. Every time someone questions his readiness to lead this country, the argument should be, He led the team that beat the best political machine in the country in the primaries, He IS ready to lead this country."

    Yea, that gives me great confidence......
     
  8. W.P.T.

    W.P.T. TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    8,371
    Personlly, I think a lot of us will be amazed at how many loyal and Patriotic Americans go to the polls and vote for this clown, once its all over ... Talk about smooth, Obama is it in spades (no pun intended) ... WPT ... (YAC) ...
     
  9. Post  2

    Post 2 TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    468
    When voting for President of the U.S remeber to vote white because black isn't right. Post-2
     
  10. tad houston

    tad houston TS Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2006
    Messages:
    477
    Post-2

    Race is not the issue here, at least as far as I am concerned.

    There are PLENTY of reasons not to vote for BHO, see the link above and take your pick.

    But in a way Race is part of the equation in that, by ANY definition, he is a racist and that is something I will not support.
     
  11. Jerbear

    Jerbear TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    3,588
    <a href="http://s35.photobucket.com/albums/d184/Jerbear1098/potus/?action=view&current=obamaandpastor.jpg" target="_blank">[​IMG]</a> <a href="http://s35.photobucket.com/albums/d184/Jerbear1098/potus/?action=view&current=obamanation.jpg" target="_blank">[​IMG]</a> <a href="http://s35.photobucket.com/albums/d184/Jerbear1098/potus/?action=view&current=Osamaoilposter.jpg" target="_blank">[​IMG]</a> <a href="http://s35.photobucket.com/albums/d184/Jerbear1098/potus/?action=view&current=democraticseal.jpg" target="_blank">[​IMG]</a>
     
  12. slide action

    slide action Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    4,918
    There will be an amazing number of people who vote for this socisalist bozo. They will chany Change,change but have no clue what CHANGE he has planned! He will turn this country on it's ear. He will destroy the 2nd ammendment(as well as the rest of the constitution), destroy the economy, gut the military and give away this nations souvernty, all why doubling taxes, increasing unemployment, bankrupting social services and surrendering this country to the muslim extremist! This guy is not just an IDIOT, he is EVIL personified! What he and his witch from Hell wife will do to the preidentcy will NEVER be repaired. God help us if he wins!
     
  13. Post  2

    Post 2 TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    468
    To call a black man black is racist? I don't think so. Post-2
     
  14. Ben Eitle

    Ben Eitle TS Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2008
    Messages:
    11
    I don't know if any of you knew this or not, I dident untill the grand when a Beretta usa gunsmith announced to all of us at the drury inn in fairview heights that BHO voted AGAINST the GRAND complex in sparta Ill. Does he not know how much income this creates, or does he really want to get rid of all guns? just thought this was interesting and worth passing along and also thank you to the beretta usa employee for sharing this interesting piece of info.
     
  15. W.P.T.

    W.P.T. TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    8,371
    The only thing that Obama has voted in favor of is Tax increases, 91 times ... WPT ... (YAC) ...
     
  16. H82MIS

    H82MIS TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    2,052
    What to talk about taxes do you????? Please read the last sentence,,,,



    A nice-sounding bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations.

    Senator Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has not endorsed either Senator Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton in the presidential race. But on Thursday, February 14, he is trying to rush Obama's "Global Poverty Act" (S.2433) through his committee. The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends.

    The bill, which is item number four on the committee's business meeting agenda, passed the House by a voice vote last year because most members didn't realize what was in it. Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require. According to the website of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, no hearings have been held on the Obama bill in that body.

    A release from the Obama Senate office about the bill declares, "In 2000, the U.S. joined more than 180 countries at the United Nations Millennium Summit and vowed to reduce global poverty by 2015. We are halfway towards this deadline, and it is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day."

    The legislation itself requires the President "to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day."

    The bill defines the term "Millennium Development Goals" as the goals set out in the United Nations Millennium Declaration, General Assembly Resolution 55/2 (2000).

    The U.N. says that "The commitment to provide 0.7% of gross national product (GNP) as official development assistance was first made 35 years ago in a General Assembly resolution, but it has been reaffirmed repeatedly over the years, including at the 2002 global Financing for Development conference in Monterrey, Mexico. However, in 2004, total aid from the industrialized countries totaled just $78.6 billion-or about 0.25% of their collective GNP."

    In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that declaration commits nations to banning "small arms and light weapons" and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

    The Millennium Declaration also affirms the U.N. as "the indispensable common house of the entire human family, through which we will seek to realize our universal aspirations for peace, cooperation and development."

    Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the U.N.'s "Millennium Project," says that the U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP in increased foreign aid spending would add $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already spends. Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.'s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the "Millennium Development Goals," this amounts to $845 billion. And the only way to raise that kind of money, Sachs has written, is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels.

    Obama's bill has only six co-sponsors. They are Senators Maria Cantwell, Dianne Feinstein, Richard Lugar, Richard Durbin, Chuck Hagel and Robert Menendez. But it appears that Biden and Obama see passage of this bill as a way to highlight Democratic Party priorities in the Senate.

    The House version (H.R. 1302), sponsored by Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), had only 84 co-sponsors before it was suddenly brought up on the House floor last September 25 and was passed by voice vote. House Republicans were caught off-guard, unaware that the pro-U.N. measure committed the U.S. to spending hundreds of billions of dollars.

    It appears the Senate version is being pushed not only by Biden and Obama, a member of the committee, but Lugar, the ranking Republican member. Lugar has worked with Obama in the past to promote more foreign aid for Russia, supposedly to stem nuclear proliferation, and has become Obama's mentor. Like Biden, Lugar is a globalist. They have both promoted passage of the U.N.'s Law of the Sea Treaty, for example.

    The so-called "Lugar-Obama initiative" was modeled after the Nunn-Lugar program, also known as the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program, which was designed to eliminate weapons of mass destruction in the former Soviet Union. But one defense analyst, Rich Kelly, noted evidence that "CTR funds have eased the Russian military's budgetary woes, freeing resources for such initiatives as the war in Chechnya and defense modernization." He recommended that Congress "eliminate CTR funding so that it does not finance additional, perhaps more threatening, programs in the former Soviet Union." However, over $6 billion has already been spent on the program.

    Another program modeled on Nunn-Lugar, the Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention (IPP), was recently exposed as having funded nuclear projects in Iran through Russia.

    More foreign aid through passage of the Global Poverty Act was identified as one of the strategic goals of InterAction, the alliance of U.S-based international non-governmental organizations that lobbies for more foreign aid. The group is heavily financed by the U.S. Government, having received $1.4 million from taxpayers in fiscal year 2005 and $1.7 million in 2006. However, InterAction recently issued a report accusing the United States of "falling short on its commitment to rid the world of dire poverty by 2015 under the U.N. Millennium Development Goals..."

    It's not clear what President Bush would do if the bill passes the Senate. The bill itself quotes Bush as declaring that "We fight against poverty because opportunity is a fundamental right to human dignity." Bush's former top aide, Michael J. Gerson, writes in his new book, Heroic Conservatism, that Bush should be remembered as the President who "sponsored the largest percentage increases in foreign assistance since the Marshall Plan..."

    Even these increases, however, will not be enough to satisfy the requirements of the Obama bill. A global tax will clearly be necessary to force American taxpayers to provide the money.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.