1. Attention: We have put together a thread with tips and a tutorial video to help with using the new software. Please take a moment to check out the thread here: Trapshooters.com Tutorial & Help Video.
    Dismiss Notice

Our Muslim in Chief

Discussion in 'Politics, Elections & Legislation' started by HSLDS, Jul 11, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HSLDS

    HSLDS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    6,394
    Location:
    S-E PA
    This is what Obama blocked Fox News from showing ...

    Remember all the notices we kept getting to watch Fox News on Sunday at 9 PM several weeks ago? What Happened?

    This is the clip that got pulled due to pressure from the Administration.

    Obama Puts Heat on Fox News to Prevent Sean Hannity airing this piece.

    This is a video that Sean Hannity of FOX News has been trying to show that we are told has consistently been blocked by the Obama Administration for several weeks.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28
     
  2. 391 shooter

    391 shooter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,094
  3. bigdogtx

    bigdogtx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    10,650
    Couldn't get past 3 minutes,,,,was getting ill......
     
  4. stokinpls

    stokinpls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    6,487
    This'll make ya feel better.


    [​IMG]
     
  5. GW22

    GW22 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,246
    OK, so maybe Obama a muslim.

    Maybe he's racked-up $5-Trillion of new debt in 3-1/2 years and jeopardized our kids' and grandkids' futures.

    Maybe he's increased food stamp dependence by 41% and spent $3-million on radio commercials to recruit more food stamp users.

    Maybe he lied about keeping the unemployment rate from ever reaching 8% if we went along with his "stimulus."

    Maybe his wife kinda hates America and isn't real fond of white folks.

    Maybe he tricked us when he promised he'd be a uniter and not a divider in Washington.

    Maybe he knew all about Fast & Furious and used an Executive Order to keep the truth from coming out about his and Holder's involvement in the murder of a U.S, citizen.

    Maybe he's changing the fundamental fabric of a once proud coutry and turning it into a Euro-Socialist state -- the very kind the butts of which we've been economically kicking for well over a century.

    Maybe he lied about ObamaCare not being funded by taxes and saddled us with a new entitlement which allows government to sieze 1/6 of the economy and is almost certain to eventually bankrupt the country.

    Maybe we were incredibly stupid to buy this pig-in-a-poke and put a man in charge of our country who had never run so much as a Kool-Aid stand.

    Maybe ALL of this is true.

    Nonetheless, I'm still not going to vote for Romney because he's a gun banner!

    -Gary (a deep thinker and a man of PRINCIPLES, mind you)
     
  6. grunt

    grunt TS Supporters TS Supporters

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    5,922
    Location:
    Thousand Oaks Ca
    Just watched the clip. Thats our boy...
     
  7. GW22

    GW22 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,246
    That's pretty hilarious.

    -Gary
     
  8. atra_service

    atra_service TS Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    73
    makes me sick!! Who the heck do we vote for!!! This is scary for my kids
     
  9. ou.3200

    ou.3200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    1,490
    "I'm still not going to vote for Romney" = De facto vote for Obama!
     
  10. HSLDS

    HSLDS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    6,394
    Location:
    S-E PA
    Gary,

    I have to side with ou.3200 here.

    Go back to 1992 - Bush (41) versus Clinton.

    We had just come off Bush resigning from the NRA and instituting what was essentially a ban on the production of new class III firearms.

    Like you I was pissed at our 'anti-gun incumbent.'

    There was a THIRD candidate in this go round - Ross Perot, and for the same reasons you mention I voted for him and not Bush.

    Thanks to me, and many like me, we got 8 years of Slick Wille, who, despite what Obama says, handed us the financial crisis we are in today.

    I've included a Wikipedia link - check the percent of votes taken by each - Clinton only got 43%, Bush 37.5%, but Perot 18.9%.

    Think about that, take Perot out of the equation and Bush would have pulled almost all of that extra 18.9%. Do the math - Bush would have most likely taken 56% of the vote...

    Please learn from the past...
     
  11. Barrelbulge(Fl)

    Barrelbulge(Fl) TS Supporters TS Supporters

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Messages:
    11,676
    Location:
    West Central Florida
    I don't really think the Republican party will let him screw with guns. Too many gun voters. Mike.
     
  12. shooter99

    shooter99 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    1,407
    Location:
    Blue River, Wisconsin
    GW22 think again about who is after our guns. Get your head out of the sand, open your eyes look at whats happening with this UN tready on small arms. When Obama loses in November he will try and get this Tready signed before going out of office in January.
     
  13. Jeffrey

    Jeffrey TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    67
    Yup, after about 3 minutes of seeing that smug SOB and what he stands for I had to turn it off also.
    He has got to go...
    Jeff
     
  14. Recoil Sissy

    Recoil Sissy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    2,647
    GWII:

    obummer will attempt to pass this treaty regardless. His problem is that ratification of international treaties requires a 2/3rds majority vote of the senate.

    The usual @ssholes (Schumer, Durbin, Feinstein, Franken, Kerry, Reid, Sanders, and Wyden - to name just a few) will be Johnny on the spot to approve. The twin 'bipartisan' twits from Maine will likely have their noses up obummer's keister as usual. Then there's Landrieu and Nelson who have demonstrated they can be bought.

    However... if you count the noses, obummer still loses. Even if every senate dem (including the RINOS) vote to ratify, the dems barely have a majority and nowhere near a 2/3rds majority. I wouldn't expect a single GOP vote to approve.

    obummer's best bet is to have Roberts roll over again. Given the chance, Johnny would likely side with the SCOTUS libs to allow obummer to ratify an international gun grab by fiat.

    sissy
     
  15. HSLDS

    HSLDS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    6,394
    Location:
    S-E PA
    Gary,

    I have to side with ou.3200 here.

    Go back to 1992 - Bush (41) versus Clinton.

    We had just come off Bush resigning from the NRA and instituting what was essentially a ban on the production of new class III firearms.

    Like you I was pissed at our 'anti-gun incumbent.'

    There was a THIRD candidate in this go round - Ross Perot, and for the same reasons you mention I voted for him and not Bush.

    Thanks to me, and many like me, we got 8 years of Slick Wille, who, despite what Obama says, handed us the financial crisis we are in today.

    I've included a Wikipedia link - check the percent of votes taken by each - Clinton only got 43%, Bush 37.5%, but Perot 18.9%.

    Think about that, take Perot out of the equation and Bush would have pulled almost all of that extra 18.9%. Do the math - Bush would have most likely taken 56% of the vote...

    Please learn from the past...
     
  16. Barrelbulge(Fl)

    Barrelbulge(Fl) TS Supporters TS Supporters

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Messages:
    11,676
    Location:
    West Central Florida
    I don't really think the Republican party will let him screw with guns. Too many gun voters. Mike.
     
  17. shooter99

    shooter99 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    1,407
    Location:
    Blue River, Wisconsin
    GW22 think again about who is after our guns. Get your head out of the sand, open your eyes look at whats happening with this UN tready on small arms. When Obama loses in November he will try and get this Tready signed before going out of office in January.
     
  18. Jeffrey

    Jeffrey TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    67
    Yup, after about 3 minutes of seeing that smug SOB and what he stands for I had to turn it off also.
    He has got to go...
    Jeff
     
  19. Recoil Sissy

    Recoil Sissy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    2,647
    GWII:

    obummer will attempt to pass this treaty regardless. His problem is that ratification of international treaties requires a 2/3rds majority vote of the senate.

    The usual @ssholes (Schumer, Durbin, Feinstein, Franken, Kerry, Reid, Sanders, and Wyden - to name just a few) will be Johnny on the spot to approve. The twin 'bipartisan' twits from Maine will likely have their noses up obummer's keister as usual. Then there's Landrieu and Nelson who have demonstrated they can be bought.

    However... if you count the noses, obummer still loses. Even if every senate dem (including the RINOS) vote to ratify, the dems barely have a majority and nowhere near a 2/3rds majority. I wouldn't expect a single GOP vote to approve.

    obummer's best bet is to have Roberts roll over again. Given the chance, Johnny would likely side with the SCOTUS libs to allow obummer to ratify an international gun grab by fiat.

    sissy
     
  20. rooferbob

    rooferbob Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    1,474
    Location:
    Hamilton Ohio
    Buldge You should read the thread about the UN gunban treaty if you dont think they will try take our guns.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.