1. Attention: We have put together a thread with tips and a tutorial video to help with using the new software. Please take a moment to check out the thread here: Trapshooters.com Tutorial & Help Video.
    Dismiss Notice

OT--S&W question

Discussion in 'Shooting Related Threads' started by Sky Buster, Jan 11, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sky Buster

    Sky Buster Sky Buster TS Supporters

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    3,111
    Location:
    Minnesota
    There were no bad years. If you have a problem with
    a S&W send it back and they will make it right at no-charge.
     
  2. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,302
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    S&W has an ongoing issue with the cylinders locking up under heavy recoil because of how the new safety garbage is designed, but that won't be a problem with a .22 LR.

    The 10-shot S&W .22's I don't like are the ones with aluminum cylinders. Make mine steel.
     
  3. elinvar

    elinvar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    856
    I personally don't like much that has come out of the factory in the last few years- I don't think you can beat an old K-22 from the 50's- if you want a 10 shot- look for a 617-3. there was one on gun broker recently that had the steel cylinder (some had an alloy cylinder). Anything with the hammer lock I tend to avoid.
    The original 617 no dash is still my favorite S&W.
    Terry Jones
     
  4. hmb

    hmb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    10,045
    Nothing better than an old 5 screw revolver. HMB
     
  5. OldGoat

    OldGoat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,897
    Location:
    Overland Park KS
    My new 617 10 shot had to be returned to the factory because several chambers were cut oversize causing the empties to bulge and not eject - I had to use a cleaning rod in some chambers to punch the empties out. S&W replaced the cylinder, but I still had a problem with a few chambers. Then, I discovered the rear sight was loose. Sold it, took a $250 bath and looked for an old K22. (This all happened about 2 years ago.) Regards, Ed
     
  6. GW22

    GW22 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,245
    The absolute best, as well as some of the worst revolvers I have ever owned have been S&Ws. The company has had countless ownership and mgt group changes, and quality has indeed varied signficantly.

    I've seen a cylinder bulge & seize in the first box of .38s ever fired thru it. My J-Frame, on the other hand, has been a joy for many years and remains amazingly accurate.

    Shop very carefully if buying used, or simply buy new from a dealer you trust. I haven't heard any horror stories in more than ten years.

    -Gary
     
  7. chipking

    chipking TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    1,760
    Just my humble opinion but the worst years for Smith & Wesson quality were during the period of time they were owned by/part of Bangor Punta 1965 - 1987 I believe that within that time frame 1972 - 1983 were the worst for Quality Control and fit and finish of the revolvers and intro of various Semi Automatics with less than stellar reputations with many of the various Police Departments that used them.
    The new 10 shot 22s are OK but no where near the quality of the old K-22s. If you have a chance try an older K-22 single and double action against a new one and you will feel the difference. Still the 10 shot is whats out there today and quite acceptable if you just like to plink and have fun.

    --- Chip King ---
     
  8. rodbuster

    rodbuster TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    713
    I would buy a 5 screw K-22. There won't be any more of them, and the quality is top notch. Also, the value will just go up over the years if you take care of it. Be careful though, once you start getting into the older S&W's, they are addictive.
     
  9. AveragEd

    AveragEd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    5,581
    Location:
    Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
    What Chip said. I have a 6" no-dash 617 and have turned down some obscene offers for it. If you troll sites like GunBroker, you'll find those old girls in like-new condition bringing bids approaching $1,000.

    Some of the newer stuff is good, too. I have about a dozen S&W revolvers made between 1985 and 2001 and there isn't a bad one in the bunch. A lot of S&W fanatics get in heat and on point over the older guns with pinned barrels and recessed cylinder chambers but that stuff doesn't do anything for me. Even the later MIM hammers, triggers and cylinder releases aren't hateful. I have several 629s with forged parts and one with MIMs and can't tell any difference when shooting them. Likewise, I have numerous 686s with forged and one with MIM and they feel the same, too.

    Now the internal lock and its ugly Hillary Hole - no, thanks.

    Ed
     
  10. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,302
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Did someone say 5-screw?
     
  11. Rem 1100

    Rem 1100 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    125
    Location:
    Washington State
    Nice one Brian!
     
  12. SirMissalott

    SirMissalott Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,238
    Bangar Punta = not so good!!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.