1. Attention: We have put together a thread with tips and a tutorial video to help with using the new software. Please take a moment to check out the thread here: Trapshooters.com Tutorial & Help Video.
    Dismiss Notice

MSNBC: You children belong to the collective

Discussion in 'Politics, Elections & Legislation' started by Brian in Oregon, Apr 8, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,254
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    Kurt Nimmo

    April 6, 2013

    In the video below, college professor and MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry says your children are not yours – they are owned by the community. She says public education has failed because we have not allowed the state to confiscate more of our money.

    “We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families,” says the professor of political science at Tulane University, where she is founding director of the Anna Julia Cooper Project on Gender, Race, and Politics in the South. Kids belong to whole communities, she insists, and once we realize this we’ll make “better investments” in government indoctrination of children.

    Melissa Harris-Perry is regurgitating the Obama “you didn’t build that” meme. “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that,” Obama said during a campaign stop in Roanoke, Virginia. “Somebody else made that happen,” it was not the result of individual initiative. “The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”

    “Like most people of his ideological bent, Obama either cannot or will not distinguish between society — which is created through peaceful commerce and other forms of private cooperation — and the state — an anti-social artifact built on conquest, coercion, and confiscation of wealth,” writes William Grigg. “Government produces nothing; it is an exercise in pure consumption and, usually, the destruction of capital. As Nietzsche famously said, everything the State has is stolen.”

    Stephan Kinsella argues that the primary social evil today is a lack of respect for the fundamental right of self-ownership. Obama and Harris-Perry represent the other side of this argument. They believe, as do all Marxists and socialists, that the state, what Harris-Perry calls the “community,” owns the individual.

    Harris-Perry urges us to “break through” the “private idea” that individuals own themselves. Like Marx, she believes the individual is a “communal being” and all human worth is intractably linked to the community, the collective, and the state is the ultimate manifestation of the collective will.

    Harris-Perry’s homage to the state was part of a two-year long, multi-million dollar advertising campaign by MSNBC. The network, created through a merger between Microsoft and the death merchant General Electric, has long provided ideological fodder for president Obama, the proud Marxist (as Yuri Maltsev, former advisor to Mikhail Gorbachev, characterized him). “We can go backward, or we can keep moving forward,” he said during a speech at Carnegie Mellon University. “And I don’t know about you, but I want to move forward.”

    It’s no mistake Obama’s handlers and MSNBC adopted the slogan. The word “forward” has a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It was frequently used as a name for socialist and communist newspapers and periodicals in the 20th century. “The slogan ‘Forward!’ reflected the conviction of European Marxists and radicals that their movements reflected the march of history, which would move forward past capitalism and into socialism and communism,” writes Victor Morton.

    It seems incomprehensible that a multinational corporation like MSNBC would embrace communism. In fact, as Gary Allen noted, it is quite natural.

    “If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of superrich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all,” he wrote. “Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite.”

    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/N3qtpdSQox0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  2. darr

    darr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    2,006
    That is one scary story.Everytime these douche bags mention a conservative,the next word out of there sewers is radical.It doesn't get much more radical than this article.The revolution is closer than I'm ready for.But I welcome it.


    Darr
     
  3. timberfaller

    timberfaller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,972
    Location:
    Eastern Washington
    Have to agree with Rush on this one!!

    The guys in White coats and a straight jacket needs to make a visit on her!!

    OUR kids are OUR'S not no stinking government agency!!! or Liberal thinkers!
     
  4. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,254
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    Darr, the reason the left calls conservatives 'radicals' is that it is right out of the communist manifesto.

    They believe themselves to be normal, thus anyone that counter to them is a "radical". They divide potential converts into two groups. The progressives, because they are progressing towards socialism and communism, and reactionaries, because they are reacting against socialism and communism.

    In the communist POW camps in Korea prisoners were divided into the two groups - progressives and reactionaries. The progressives enjoyed perks like more and a little better food, tools to raise vegetables, sometimes tobacco, and for some that made real progress, they could even go to the nearest village to barter for vegetables. The reactionaries were starved, beaten, tortured, denied medical care and enjoyed none of the perks.

    Now look how the liberal politicians act. If you are a progressive, you get EBT cards, welfare, socialized medicine, disability payments, grants, the ability to be in the country illegally, and every other liberal perk. If you are a reactionary, you get your gun rights stripped, no privacy, onerous taxes, rationing of your health care to pay for others, etc.
     
  5. chuckie68

    chuckie68 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,839
    Location:
    Royal Oak, Michigan
    This same BULLCRAP was spewed by Barry Goldwater back in 1962. Look where it got him politically and look at the "now politicians and educators" and see where it is going to get them. The "Revolution" is closer than anyone thinks.

    Chuck
     
  6. kgp912kgp

    kgp912kgp Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    802
    THANKS Brian,

    I know whose kids mine are, and whose responsibility it is to see to it that they learn the true right from wrong.
     
  7. avery53

    avery53 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    673
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
  8. GW22

    GW22 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,246
    Round and round we go. The center of the toilet isn't far away.

    -Gary
     
  9. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,254
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    BORG indeed.

    You will be assimilated into the collective.

    Resistance is futile.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.