1. Attention: We have put together a thread with tips and a tutorial video to help with using the new software. Please take a moment to check out the thread here: Trapshooters.com Tutorial & Help Video.
    Dismiss Notice

Media: Firing supeonas "too obsessed"

Discussion in 'Uncategorized Threads' started by Brian in Oregon, Mar 23, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,254
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    Media: Firing supeonas

    NBC/ABC/CBS: Subpoenas "too scandal obsessed"<br>
    <br>
    Posted By: "partisan","waste of resources" (141.248.186.244)<br>
    Date: 3/23/07 14:47<br>
    <br>
    That was then. This is now.<br>
    <br>
    http://www.mrc.org/realitycheck/2007/fax20070323.asp<br>
    <br>
    Ten Years Ago, Subpoenas Drew TV Yawns<br>
    <br>
    When Team Clinton Was Subpoenaed, Reporters Found 'Hard-Charging
    Partisans' Wasting Tax Money<br>
    <br>
    With the Democrats back in power, network anchors are dwelling
    lovingly on congressional hearings now with liberal stars like Al
    Gore and Valerie Plame. They've shown no loss of appetite for
    hearings on the U.S. Attorney-firings scandal, deemed a
    "constitutional crisis" by NBC Wednesday night. But ten years ago,
    when a Republican Congress prepared subpoenas for the Clinton White
    House on receiving political contributions from China, viewers heard
    the networks sing a very different tune.<br>
    <br>
    > ABC wondered whether subpoenas and hearings weren't democracy in
    action, but a waste of America's resources. On the April 10, 1997
    World News Tonight, anchor Peter Jennings promoted a story: "When we
    come back, two investigations of fundraising abuse, two of them on
    Capitol Hill. Is it a waste of time and money?" Reporter John Cochran
    underlined the problem of GOP partisanship: "Dan Burton is a hard-
    charging partisan and has resisted investigating anyone but Democrats."<br>
    <br>
    ABC's Linda Douglass insisted there was public boredom at the end of
    a story on the July 18, 1997 World News Tonight: "Democrats gripe
    that the hearings are too partisan, so next week the committee will
    focus on foreign contributions to Republicans, all the while
    wondering if the public is paying attention to any of this."<br>
    <br>
    > CBS cast the House subpoena plans as a partisan food fight. On the
    April 11, 1997 CBS This Morning, substitute anchor Cynthia Bowers
    began: "Not long ago, there was a lot of talk on Capitol Hill about
    returning a sense of civility to congressional debate. Remember that?
    Well, forget it. When the debate is over money and politics, the
    gloves come off in the House of Representatives."<br>
    <br>
    Reporter Bob Schieffer warned: "The House committee trying to
    investigate campaign irregularities has broken into complete partisan
    disarray over how much power to give Republican Chairman Dan
    Burton....Democrats did everything but throw food when Burton laid
    out ground rules for the investigation, under which he could subpoena
    witnesses and documents without the Democrats'
    permission....Democrats say Burton is destroying the committee's
    credibility by concentrating only on Democratic
    irregularities....Democrats fear the probe is already out of control."<br>
    <br>
    On July 31, 1997, the Senate committee probing the Asian money
    scandal voted unanimously to subpoena the White House after they took
    months to release documents about illegal donations to the DNC. The
    only network mention came from Bob Schieffer on the July 30 CBS
    Evening News â€" but nothing after subpoenas were issued.<br>
    <br>
    > NBC theorized that the media were too Clinton-scandal obsessed in
    1997. On June 17, 1997, Today co-host Katie Couric asked reporter Bob
    Woodward: "But are members of the media, do you think, Bob, too
    scandal-obsessed, looking for something at every corner?"<br>
    <br>
    On August 1, even as the Senate moved to subpoena the White House, co-
    host Matt Lauer professed: "But there aren't any major storm clouds
    on the horizon for Bill Clinton, other than maybe Medicare reform."
    Newsweek's Jonathan Alter replied: "Yeah, but of course there are
    these possible scandals, but when the economy is doing well, the
    public really doesn't seem to care much about anything else."<br>
    <br>
    On October 8, Today co-host Katie Couric framed the hearings for Sen.
    Arlen Specter: "Perhaps this is an intentional effort to embarrass
    the Democratic Party?" On the November 7 Today, NBC's Lisa Myers
    pressed Senator Fred Thompson: "Your hearings clearly reinforced the
    public's already low opinion of politicians and politics. Beyond
    that, what did it accomplish?"
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.