1. Attention: We have put together a thread with tips and a tutorial video to help with using the new software. Please take a moment to check out the thread here: Trapshooters.com Tutorial & Help Video.
    Dismiss Notice

Kiss your Third Amendment rights goodbye...

Discussion in 'Politics, Elections & Legislation' started by Brian in Oregon, Jul 4, 2013.

  1. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,238
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    Yes, I said Third Amendment, no quartering of soldiers. Or in this case, police officers.

    LAS VEGAS (CN) - Henderson police arrested a family for refusing to let officers use their homes as lookouts for a domestic violence investigation of their neighbors, the family claims in court.

    Anthony Mitchell and his parents Michael and Linda Mitchell sued the City of Henderson, its Police Chief Jutta Chambers, Officers Garret Poiner, Ronald Feola, Ramona Walls, Angela Walker, and Christopher Worley, and City of North Las Vegas and its Police Chief Joseph Chronister, in Federal Court.

    Henderson, pop. 257,000, is a suburb of Las Vegas.

    The Mitchell family's claim includes Third Amendment violations, a rare claim in the United States. The Third Amendment prohibits quartering soldiers in citizens' homes in times of peace without the consent of the owner.

    "On the morning of July 10th, 2011, officers from the Henderson Police Department responded to a domestic violence call at a neighbor's residence," the Mitchells say in the complaint.

    It continues: "At 10:45 a.m. defendant Officer Christopher Worley (HPD) contacted plaintiff Anthony Mitchell via his telephone. Worley told plaintiff that police needed to occupy his home in order to gain a 'tactical advantage' against the occupant of the neighboring house. Anthony Mitchell told the officer that he did not want to become involved and that he did not want police to enter his residence. Although Worley continued to insist that plaintiff should leave his residence, plaintiff clearly explained that he did not intend to leave his home or to allow police to occupy his home. Worley then ended the phone call.

    Mitchell claims that defendant officers, including Cawthorn and Worley and Sgt. Michael Waller then "conspired among themselves to force Anthony Mitchell out of his residence and to occupy his home for their own use." (Waller is identified as a defendant in the body of the complaint, but not in the heading of it.)

    The complaint continues: "Defendant Officer David Cawthorn outlined the defendants' plan in his official report: 'It was determined to move to 367 Evening Side and attempt to contact Mitchell. If Mitchell answered the door he would be asked to leave. If he refused to leave he would be arrested for Obstructing a Police Officer. If Mitchell refused to answer the door, force entry would be made and Mitchell would be arrested.'"

    At a few minutes before noon, at least five defendant officers "arrayed themselves in front of plaintiff Anthony Mitchell's house and prepared to execute their plan," the complaint states.

    It continues: "The officers banged forcefully on the door and loudly commanded Anthony Mitchell to open the door to his residence.

    "Surprised and perturbed, plaintiff Anthony Mitchell immediately called his mother (plaintiff Linda Mitchell) on the phone, exclaiming to her that the police were beating on his front door.

    "Seconds later, officers, including Officer Rockwell, smashed open plaintiff Anthony Mitchell's front door with a metal ram as plaintiff stood in his living room.

    "As plaintiff Anthony Mitchell stood in shock, the officers aimed their weapons at Anthony Mitchell and shouted obscenities at him and ordered him to lie down on the floor.

    "Fearing for his life, plaintiff Anthony Mitchell dropped his phone and prostrated himself onto the floor of his living room, covering his face and hands.

    "Addressing plaintiff as 'asshole', officers, including Officer Snyder, shouted conflicting orders at Anthony Mitchell, commanding him to both shut off his phone, which was on the floor in front of his head, and simultaneously commanding him to 'crawl' toward the officers.

    "Confused and terrified, plaintiff Anthony Mitchell remained curled on the floor of his living room, with his hands over his face, and made no movement.

    "Although plaintiff Anthony Mitchell was lying motionless on the ground and posed no threat, officers, including Officer David Cawthorn, then fired multiple 'pepperball' rounds at plaintiff as he lay defenseless on the floor of his living room. Anthony Mitchell was struck at least three times by shots fired from close range, injuring him and causing him severe pain." (Parentheses in complaint.)

    Officers then arrested him for obstructing a police officer, searched the house and moved furniture without his permission and set up a place in his home for a lookout, Mitchell says in the complaint.

    He says they also hurt his pet dog for no reason whatsoever: "Plaintiff Anthony Mitchell's pet, a female dog named 'Sam,' was cowering in the corner when officers smashed through the front door. Although the terrified animal posed no threat to officers, they gratuitously shot it with one or more pepperball rounds. The panicked animal howled in fear and pain and fled from the residence. Sam was subsequently left trapped outside in a fenced alcove without access to water, food, or shelter from the sun for much of the day, while temperatures outside soared to over 100 degrees Fahrenheit."

    Anthony and his parents live in separate houses, close to one another on the same street. He claims that police treated his parents the same way.

    "Meanwhile, starting at approximately 10:45 a.m., police officers entered the back yard of plaintiffs Michael Mitchell and Linda Mitchell's residence at 362 Eveningside Avenue. The officers asked plaintiff Michael Mitchell if he would be willing to vacate his residence and accompany them to their 'command center' under the guise that the officers wanted Michael Mitchell's assistance in negotiating the surrender of the neighboring suspect at 363 Eveningside Avenue. Plaintiff Michael Mitchell reluctantly agreed to follow the officers from his back yard to the HPD command center, which was approximately one quarter mile away," the complaint states.

    "When plaintiff Michael Mitchell arrived at the HPD command center, he was informed that the suspect was 'not taking any calls' and that plaintiff Michael Mitchell would not be permitted to call the suspect neighbor from his own phone. At that time, Mr. Mitchell realized that the request to accompany officers to the HPD command center was a tactic to remove him from his house. He waited approximately ten minutes at the HPD command center and was told he could not return to his home.

    "Plaintiff Michael Mitchell then left HPD command center and walked down Mauve Street toward the exit of the neighborhood. After walking for less than five minutes, an HPD car pulled up next to him. He was told that his wife, Linda Mitchell, had 'left the house' and would meet him at the HPD command center. Michael Mitchell then walked back up Mauve Street to the HPD command center. He called his son, James Mitchell, to pick him up at the HPD command center. When plaintiff Michael Mitchell attempted to leave the HPD command center to meet James, he was arrested, handcuffed and placed in the back of a marked police car.

    "Officers had no reasonable grounds to detain plaintiff Michael Mitchell, nor probable
    cause to suspect him of committing any crime.

    "At approximately 1:45 p.m., a group of officers entered the backyard of plaintiffs Michael Mitchell and Linda Mitchell's residence at 362 Eveningside Avenue. They banged on the back door of the house and demanded that plaintiff Linda Mitchell open the door.

    "Plaintiff Linda Mitchell complied and opened the door to her home. When she told officers that they could not enter her home without a warrant, the officers ignored her. One officer, defendant Doe 1, seized her by the arm, and other officers entered her home without permission.

    "Defendant Doe 1 then forcibly pulled plaintiff Linda Mitchell out of her house.

    "Another unidentified officer, defendant Doe 2, then seized plaintiff Linda Mitchell's purse and began rummaging through it, without permission, consent, or a warrant.

    "Defendant Doe 1 then escorted Linda Mitchell at a brisk pace through her yard and
    up the hill toward the 'Command Post' while maintaining a firm grip on her upper arm. Plaintiff Linda Mitchell is physically frail and had difficulty breathing due to the heat and the swift pace. However, Doe 1 ignored her pleas to be released or to at least slow down, and refused to provide any explanation for why she was being treated in such a manner.

    "In the meantime, the officers searched and occupied plaintiffs Michael Mitchell and
    Linda Mitchell's house. When plaintiff Linda Mitchell returned to her home, the cabinets and closet doors throughout the house had been left open and their contents moved about. Water had been consumed from their water dispenser. Even the refrigerator door had been left ajar and mustard and mayonnaise had been left on their kitchen floor."

    Police took Anthony and Michael Mitchell to jail and booked them for obstructing an officer. They were jailed for at least nine hours before they bailed out, they say in the complaint. All criminals charged were dismissed with prejudice. They claim the defendants filed the baseless criminal charges "to provide cover for defendants' wrongful actions, to frustrate and impede plaintiffs' ability to seek relief for those actions, and to further intimidate and retaliate against plaintiffs."

    None of the officers were ever subjected to official discipline or even inquiry, the complaint states.

    The Mitchells seek punitive damages for violations of the third, fourth and 14th Amendments, assault and battery, conspiracy, defamation, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, negligence and emotional distress.

    They are represented by Benjamin C. Durham, with Cofer, Geller & Durham, in Las Vegas
     
  2. noknock1

    noknock1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    1,399
    Location:
    Stranger in a Strange Land
    WOW!!! That seems to be an atrocious abuse of authority, this will be an interesting trial if the city doesn't end up settling out court and firing the officers first.
     
  3. Kevin Fleming

    Kevin Fleming Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    447
    If as reported, this will probably be settled for seriously big money, taxpayer money. No wonder we need more taxes!

    K
     
  4. shot410ga

    shot410ga Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    7,759
    This will never go to court. Big buck settlement.
     
  5. Michael.B

    Michael.B Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Messages:
    96
    If it were me, I wouldn't settle for less than guilty verdicts for kidnapping, assault and battery, theft, vandalism, .....
     
  6. Catpower

    Catpower Molon Labe TS Supporters

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    10,229
    Location:
    In the Cabana
    We are quickly becoming a police state, $hit we are already there, this episode and the one in Boston where the cops we breaking down doors or pretty much using forced entry looking for the bombers

    I know they need to catch the bad guys, but we still have our rights that they are ignoring
     
  7. billyboy07208

    billyboy07208 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    571
    When a thug harms a police officer,he should be punished to the fullest extent.

    When a officer harms a common citizen,he should be punished to the same fullest extent.

    It has to be this way.
     
  8. Ljutic111

    Ljutic111 TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,730
    I guess these officers figured they could do whatever it takes to get the job done. I hope it hits them in the ass. Yes and too bad it won`t be coming out of their pocket, which it should be.
     
  9. rpeerless

    rpeerless Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    Messages:
    3,688
    http://visiontoamerica.com/15379/seventy-two-killed-resisting-gun-confiscation-in-boston/

    and Second? Odd article.
     
  10. HSLDS

    HSLDS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    6,335
    Location:
    S-E PA
    Here is an interesting article on the subject. It links to a Cato Institute map which is rather telling

    http://www.timesdispatch.com/opinion/our-opinion/columnists-blogs/bart-hinkle/hinkle-commit-any-felonies-lately/article_58344fc1-7d4f-584a-8d16-36a1b1f2cdc0.html
     
  11. bigdogtx

    bigdogtx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    10,650
    You just don't understand,,,,,,,,I am sure gene 7x7 will be by to explain the law to you,,,,,,,548 will the chime in and say the police were within THEIR rights..........
     
  12. drgondog

    drgondog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2012
    Messages:
    942
    All of them need to be tried and convicted for at least a.) Breaking and Entering, b.) Assault and battery, c.) violation of Civil Rights, d.) illegal apprehension and detention - and be liable for civil lawsuit.

    If City of Henderson does not immediately suspend these clowns without pay they should be part of the Lawsuit, as well as any councilmen who are apprised of the situation and take no action.

    not to mention any charges related to shooting the dog - my preference in that specific is to be permitted to shoot the police officer that injured the dog with the same weapon.
     
  13. Texshooter

    Texshooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    710
    If even part of this is true, those officers need to have their Law enforcement license, paperwork, and gun permit permanently removed. AJ
     
  14. rpeerless

    rpeerless Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    Messages:
    3,688
    Incredible story to follow. CATO map is colorful to say the least.
     
  15. crusha

    crusha TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    5,762
    "Gain a tactical advantage" on a domestic offender? How about simply obtaining a probable cause warrant and arresting the sob?


    What this tells me, is that they really didn't have any credible case of domestic offense on the neighbor (ie, no complaint, nobody pressing charges), and just wanted to perform a surveillance operation.


    If there was a real, credible case of actual domestic violence (ie, probable cause), they wouldn't need to inconvenience the neighbor in this way. Go collar the guy, and quip "sorry for the disturbance" over your shoulder towards the neighbors as you leave with the perp.


    I tell you, the Police are cutting their own throats in this country. They keep it up, and they're going to have so many laws, restrictions, and injunctions against what they're doing, they'll need a judge's signature to take a piss.


    If they're attempting to explore the legal landscape and "see where the boundaries are," the people are going to show them, and move it back 10 or 20 yards in the process.
     
  16. bigdogtx

    bigdogtx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    10,650
    Wonder why they didn't try next door and maybe they would have let them set up surveillance. I think they just got pi$$ed to be told NO,,,,,,,and they were going to show this guy who was "boss",,,,,,,,,hope he takes them to the cleaners.....

    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/RVmGWLsn0iM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  17. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,238
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    "It's OK officer, I wasn't using <i>THOSE</i> rights today,"
     
  18. Barrelbulge(Fl)

    Barrelbulge(Fl) Banned User Banned TS Supporters

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Messages:
    11,666
    Location:
    West Central Florida
    Just on fox this morning homeowners have filed suit. The Police also went through the house and performed an illegal search. 3rd and 4th amendment violations. Bulge.
     
  19. GW22

    GW22 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,246
    This story is a total outrage to anyone who understands what America stands for. If "journalism" still existed in this country every adult in America would be aware of this.

    -Gary