1. Attention: We have put together a thread with tips and a tutorial video to help with using the new software. Please take a moment to check out the thread here: Trapshooters.com Tutorial & Help Video.
    Dismiss Notice

HR2150 of 2009 - Govt can deny guns on a whim

Discussion in 'Politics, Elections & Legislation' started by Brian in Oregon, Jul 19, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,254
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    HR2159 of 2009 is the gun version of the government "No Fly List". This makes a "No Guns List", wherein the Attorney General can, on a whim, decide who can and cannot have firearms.<br>
    <br>
    The link goes to a page showing HR2159 of 2009. It is important to note this link, and copy it if you cross-post this on another site. Because if you go the the official House of Representatives website, they're showing a dead bill from 2007. This is a subtle piece of subterfuge to deliberately confuse people into thinking this bill is dead. It is not. Anti-gunners have been linking to the dead bill on the official website to stymie their opposition, who then can't find the real bill. So remember this link. These cockroaches don't want any light shined on them.
     
  2. halfmile

    halfmile Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    15,648
    Location:
    Green Bay Wisconsin
    Just one hour ago there was an NRA person on the phone telling me about this one.

    Also concern was expressed about hr45, the Blair holt bill which would require licensing angd fingerprinting to own a gun.

    Wonder where our resident pukes are now? Silent is my guess.

    Robin, fire up the Bitchmobile, we have work to do.

    HM
     
  3. brigade

    brigade TS Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2009
    Messages:
    229
    When is the time to hold these anti-Americans responsible for their anti-American tactics ? Ed
     
  4. bigdogtx

    bigdogtx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    10,650
    HM,,,,they don't care as they don't own guns!!!!

    From the bill, "Sec. 922B. Attorney General’s discretion regarding applicants for firearm permits which would qualify for the exemption provided under section 922(t)(3)

    ‘The Attorney General may determine that an applicant for a firearm permit which would qualify for an exemption under section 922(t) is known (or appropriately suspected) to be or have been engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism, or providing material support thereof, and the Attorney General has a reasonable belief that the applicant may use a firearm in connection with terrorism.’; and ..."

    Remember about a month or so ago,,,,how vets et al should be construed as "terrorists"....wonder if they let that slip????
    .
     
  5. recurvyarcher

    recurvyarcher Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,450
    Anyone who supported the recent TEA party movement was labeled a terrorist.
     
  6. Brian in Oregon

    Brian in Oregon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    25,254
    Location:
    Deplorable Bitter Clinger in Liberal La La Land
    Anyone listening to Rush Limbaugh is considered a terrorist these days.
     
  7. highflyer

    highflyer TS Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,474
    Wasn't it our new Justice of the Supreme Court that couldn't decide when questioned by Coburn if the 2nd Amendment extended to individual states or not.
     
  8. bobdog

    bobdog Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    774
    What's the penalty for Contempt of Congress, and where do I go to turn myself in?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.