1. Attention: We have put together a thread with tips and a tutorial video to help with using the new software. Please take a moment to check out the thread here: Trapshooters.com Tutorial & Help Video.
    Dismiss Notice

Any Obamabots able to explain this?

Discussion in 'Politics, Elections & Legislation' started by JBrooks, Mar 13, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JBrooks

    JBrooks TS Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,707
    King Barry likes power and if he or his cronies have to lie to get it, so what? From the Wall Street Journal:<br />
    <br />
    "At the same time, after Democrats criticized former President George W. Bush's signing statements, Mr. Obama issued one of his own, declaring five provisions in the spending bill to be unconstitutional and nonbinding, including one aimed at preventing punishment of whistleblowers."<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/seAR1S1Mjkc&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/seAR1S1Mjkc&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

    Lying POS.
     
  2. halfmile

    halfmile Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    15,649
    Location:
    Green Bay Wisconsin
    So why did the fool sign it?

    HM
     
  3. berettagold53954

    berettagold53954 TS Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    475
    from what the dems say on news i watched the reps had no say even a few of the dems said the stemulus was a joke they used alot of $$$ that wont help anything but to push through the dems agenda thats been getting denied for yrs obama said himself he didnt care what republicans wanted he was passing it are you watching one of the dumbocrat channels theres too many one sided channels
     
  4. JBrooks

    JBrooks TS Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,707
    LtS,

    Don't try to change the subject, it is lame.

    The point is that Obama said he wouldn't use signing statements. As soon as he is elected he is using signing statements.

    Why is Obama such a lying POS? Answer that.
     
  5. Setterman

    Setterman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    11,159
    lts, ...Bush and the Republicans didn't make the campaign promises Barry did during an election. Barry's motto "Whatever it takes to get elected cause these people are so stupid they will never catch at it". That liar said he would not do it.... just to get elected. Are you that big of a DA??? No lobbyists? transparent government? whats best for the country? bipartisan politics? get rid of government waste? BS, he's trying to grow the government so more people are dependant on it, and thus securring Democratic votes in 2 years or 4 years. Your sign on should be "barry's bimbo" or "likes to get something for nothing".
     
  6. stokinpls

    stokinpls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    6,487
    Maybe the republicans were just trying to get their taxpayers' money back. Can't let the worthless dumocrats have all of everyone else's money to spend on smokes and booze.

    Also looks like the dummy stepped on his dick again.

    "(CNSNews.com) - On Wednesday, only two days after he lifted President Bush’s executive order banning federal funding of stem cell research that requires the destruction of human embryos, President Barack Obama signed a law that explicilty bans federal funding of any "research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed, discarded, or knowingly subjected to risk of injury or death."

    The provision was buried in the 465-page omnibus appropriations bill that Obama signed Wednesday. Known as the Dickey-Wicker amendment, it has been included in the annual appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services every fiscal year since 1996.

    Looooooooooong read at the link
    http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=44943"
     
  7. JBrooks

    JBrooks TS Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,707
    LtS,

    You never answer the questions about your crooked and deranged Democrats. just rehash your Bush Derangement Syndrome crap.

    Did Obama lie or not about signing statements?

    PS Your Oboma boy is starting to tank in the polls. He is already sucking hind tit to Bush in 2001 50 days in. LOL
     
  8. crusha

    crusha TS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    5,762
    "Okay...SIMON SAYS, no NEW earmarks...and this time...I mean it!"


    Obama is either a flat-out liar, or he was simply a naive, inexperienced campaigner who ran a bunch of silly shit off his mouth in the campaign without the slightest idea of the realities he would encounter once in office.


    No earmarks? Pu-leeze. Some of those Legislators have been in Washington longer than Obama has been born. And a lot of them still intend to be there long after he's gone. "And this punk is going to come along, and take a way our earmarks? Ha!" You can just hear them talking among themselves. No, Congress has a 98% incumbent-retention rate. It's Obama that has to worry about re-election in 4 years...not them, for the most part. He's the one who came to town with the Big Ideas...and HE needs THEM to get it implemented. He will play ball, on their terms...or he will be the next Jimmy Carter, period. He needs them, more than they need him. The Democrats in Congress have the power to make Obama ineffective...but regardless, they will still be there after he's gone.


    These Democratic Legislators did not suffer under George Bush for 8 years, patiently waiting for their turn back in power, only to have Obama come in and tell them he's yanking their earmarks away. "It" - Washington - doesn't work that way.


    In short - this will be the "Status Quo You Can Count On."
     
  9. poacherjoe

    poacherjoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,072
    Location:
    Central Kommiefornia
    Finally someone wants a direct answer!! Yes or No

    Did Obama lie? --------

    Did Nixon lie?_______

    They ALL LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!It seems that some of you think that the party you are a member of is the only one that can possibly be correct!!

    Simply answer yes or no to the above questions and go do something else and let our elected officials do there thing.Bitching and moaning isn't going to accomplish anything.:) LOL PJ
     
  10. blizzard

    blizzard Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    2,583
    I'm pretty sure that letting our elected officials do their thing is what got us into this mess.
     
  11. b12

    b12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1998
    Messages:
    3,049
    Thomas Jefferson said,A COUNTRY THAT IS BIG ENOUGH TO GIVE YOU EVERTHING YOU WANT IS BIG ENOUGH TO TAKE EVERYTHING YOU HAVE. It looks like now we are going to have to do things we don't want to do to get it back. B12
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.