
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big BoyMost Recent Posts First
|
| Posted By | Posted Date/Time |
| ShootinSue | 16-Aug-12 - 10:18 AM ET |
| RickN | 16-Aug-12 - 10:21 AM ET |
| ShootinSue | 16-Aug-12 - 10:27 AM ET |
| Setterman | 16-Aug-12 - 10:46 AM ET |
| ShootinSue | 16-Aug-12 - 12:52 PM ET |
| Garry | 16-Aug-12 - 01:05 PM ET |
| BigBadBob | 16-Aug-12 - 01:38 PM ET |
| ShootinSue | 16-Aug-12 - 01:42 PM ET |
| BigBadBob | 16-Aug-12 - 01:49 PM ET |
| ShootinSue | 16-Aug-12 - 01:53 PM ET |
| CalvinMD | 16-Aug-12 - 02:25 PM ET |
| RickN | 16-Aug-12 - 02:30 PM ET |
| halfmile | 16-Aug-12 - 02:48 PM ET |
| BigBadBob | 16-Aug-12 - 10:18 PM ET |
| CalvinMD | 17-Aug-12 - 01:45 AM ET |
| slayer | 17-Aug-12 - 09:52 AM ET |
| ctreay | 17-Aug-12 - 07:32 PM ET |
| ReconDoc | 19-Aug-12 - 03:36 PM ET |
| schneep | 19-Aug-12 - 03:50 PM ET |
| Laserwizard | 19-Aug-12 - 05:44 PM ET |
| ShootinSue | 19-Aug-12 - 05:58 PM ET |
| YOTESLAYER | 19-Aug-12 - 06:43 PM ET |
| Laserwizard | 19-Aug-12 - 07:32 PM ET |
| YOTESLAYER | 19-Aug-12 - 08:27 PM ET |
| ShootinSue | 20-Aug-12 - 05:39 AM ET |
| wolfram | 20-Aug-12 - 01:10 PM ET |
| Shotshell | 20-Aug-12 - 01:45 PM ET |
| RickN | 20-Aug-12 - 01:49 PM ET |
| ShootinSue | 20-Aug-12 - 02:02 PM ET |
| Laserwizard | 20-Aug-12 - 07:37 PM ET |
| smitty0538 | 20-Aug-12 - 10:46 PM ET |
| tnshooter111 | 20-Aug-12 - 11:16 PM ET |
| Laserwizard | 21-Aug-12 - 09:22 AM ET |
| ShootinSue | 21-Aug-12 - 11:28 AM ET |
| Shotshell | 21-Aug-12 - 11:38 AM ET |
| Laserwizard | 21-Aug-12 - 12:04 PM ET |
| Stl Flyn | 21-Aug-12 - 12:46 PM ET |
| YOTESLAYER | 21-Aug-12 - 07:44 PM ET |
| smitty0538 | 21-Aug-12 - 10:39 PM ET |
| YOTESLAYER | 21-Aug-12 - 10:51 PM ET |
| YOTESLAYER | 21-Aug-12 - 10:57 PM ET |
| smitty0538 | 21-Aug-12 - 11:00 PM ET |
| smitty0538 | 21-Aug-12 - 11:02 PM ET |
| smitty0538 | 21-Aug-12 - 11:06 PM ET |
| mette56 | 21-Aug-12 - 11:08 PM ET |
| smitty0538 | 21-Aug-12 - 11:22 PM ET |
It's getting about that time of year when bow hunters are starting to think about the upcoming season. A friend sent us this recent trail cam pic of a corn fed Illinois deer. Needless to say, the guys who hunt that ground are fired up! I'm no antler expert but I'm guessing he still has some growing to do. Any ideas on how'd he'd measure up?
Terry
Lots of length and mass there.
Must be close to 200"?
Rick,
That's what the trail cam owner thought...close to 200.
Terry
My arrow would be "ticking" on the rest from the shakes.
I don't think that comment was necessary since there are young people and ladies, like myself, that do read these threads. Since this is my thread, I would appreciate you deleting that comment. Save it for the bars or start your own thread.
Thank you, Sue
Musketman,
I agree with Sue,please delete you post.
They always look so much bigger in velvet than after the antlers are hard.
I'm guessing 180" if he's lucky.
Still a beautiful rack I would not pass up.
Let us know the actual score when the lucky hunter gets him this fall.
BigBadBob, We will, he's being watched! Do you think he'll grow anymore yet or are they already set?
Sue
I'm doubt he'll grow much more. Here in Missouri, the bucks are asually hard-horned by 1st of September. It's rare to see one in velvet after labor Day.
What part of Illinois, North, South, Centrl? He looks like he might be from Pike County.
West Central IL, close to the Mississippi. Several large bucks have been seen however, this is the first one on cam. Thank you for the info, just didn't know. Hunting fever is starting to take hold!
Sue
I must have a food fixation...I don't see antlers...I see burgers, roasts, steaks ans sausage : ) somebody pass me the A-1
Calvin, take a 1" slice of tenderloin and fry it in butter with a little worcestershire sauce. A bit of A-1 and a slice of homemade bread. Mmmmm, heck with the horns.
The inside back straps never make it home from deer camp, along with the heart.
HM
Halfmile,
We call those the tenderloins and you are correct. They never see the freezer. That's the first thing that hitts the skillet.
I agree wholeheartedly guys...the tenderloins and hearts dont even have a chance to cool to room temp around here...antlers are impressive but darn hard on the teeth and we've had enough hat racks around here over the years..no longer a priority...its what looks to be the most tender in filling the freezer
I wholeheartedly agree. Beautiful buck, but the tablefare is what really does it for me regarding venison. I am lucky enough to have hunting priveliges on a local dairy farm. The only stipulaion is that I "take at least four of 'em" yearly. With doe permits and early and late season available in this area, that makes it no problem. Horns? what horns? Bill
"Horns and tracks make pretty thin soup".
ctreay
Damn, don't anybody here eat the heart and liver???? Heart and eggs for breakfast and liver and onions for supper, with home fries of course, no ketchup, just salt and pepper. Woody
Deer antler stew tastes oooooh soooo..............crappy
Hi Sue,
I'm a certified scorer for Buckscore. This is a software that has been developed to measure the size of the bucks antlers from a photo, velvet or not, and be very, very close to the actual hard measurements taken.
I measured this buck using Buckscore and I got a non-typical gross score of 211.03 inches. It net scored 204.92.
Quite a dandy you have here. Good luck!!
Thanks so much for the information! We have several large bucks lurking about this year and since I was never a trophy hunter, (I like meat for the table), seeing these bucks may change my mind!
Thanks again! Sue
How does your software know how far the deer is from the camera? Does it use facial features and dimensions from the deers head to make a scale to measure off of? I saw that software advertised and wondered how it worked. I would guess that deer not grossing over 180". But i dont have any fancy software. More info on this software would be appreciated. Thanks
Yoteslayer
The software doesn't work on a distance from the camera. Just like you suggest, it works off of features, specifically the ear, one of the eyes or the width between the eyes. Alot of research has gone into measuring these features on many, many deer in order to establish baselines.
Depending on the angle of the deer in the photo you have to determine which of the three features gives you the best view. In this case I used the right ear. You first tell the software the state the deer was from, then tell it the age if you know it. If you don't, select unknown. Once you've chosen the feature to measure, then you measure it and hit the record button. Then the software walks you through the various steps necessary to complete the calculations where you'll measure the beams, spread, tine lengths, circumferences etc, and when finished, it asks if the deer is in velvet or not. You select the correct answer and a fully detailed score sheet is created, just like the one your local scorer would use.
Thats very cool, can the software be purchased yet? And if so where and how much is it? This is great technology. I would like to hear what this deer actually scores if taken. Id like to send you a few trailcam pics that the deer ended up being taken and the score is known, just to try it out.
Thanks for the reply
Ryan
Laserwizard,
Thanks so much for scoring this buck. I will pass the results of the Buckscore program to the guys who sent me this photo. I'm sure they'll be excited to get an accurate evaluation of this buck. The person hunting this property is a very experienced bow hunter and I'm confident he'll be able to take this deer if given the chance. But we never know about trophy bucks, do we? LOL! The bow season opens here on Oct. 1st. If any more trail cam pics show up, I'll post them on this thread. It would be nice to see him after the velvet is off.
Terry
We tend to get caught up in the numbers - I doubt you could find a hunter that wouldn't want this guy on the wall regardless of the antler score. I would just call that buck a toad! May not be correct terminology for a whitetail but we use that for the really big mulies around here.
Good mature body on this guy too - I'll bet he survives the coming hunting season, they don't get this big without knowing how to elude the predators.
Sue, sorry for the hijack. Laserwiz, can you measure this one? My employee got it this spring. Thanks. Harv
Wow!! Harv, that guy would tear out two rows of corn.
No problem! Nice one!
Sue
Shotshell Check your PM's.
I am the employee who shot the 2nd buck pictured and I know what he scored and I also have a few other record book bucks hanging on the wall, so I have some experience on the subject of harvesting large White tailed bucks,and what they score. I agree with yoteslayer and that deer will be lucky if it goes 180, and less with deductions. I also shoot all my deer in west central Illinois on my own land.and we grow em big there.Sorry Lazerwizard I dont think your software works to good. The results you gave on my deer were short and that dark area on his antlers is velvet never shed because it died before it could fall off. This happens to very old bucks when they start going down hill. My deer was 8 1/2 years old according to the biologist who looked at him. And the deer in the trail cam pic looks young, if the people hunting that land want a true monster they will let him walk for another year or two till he matures. My buck grossed 205 7/8 and 202 5/8 net as a typical. As a non typical he was 211 3/4.
Keith
I agree this deer is closer to 180 than 200. My guess is less than that though.
Smithy Considering that your scorer was able to get his hands on this rack and perform conventional measurements, and I was able to get within 1.5% of your net typical score from a flat 2D picture, I'd say this software works very good. It is not a tool that can certify world records, you have to measure via conventional means for that, but to get very close, it's an awesome tool.
You just helped authenticate it's accuracy, and assuming the same margin of error on Sue's deer, the measurements I provided are quite accurate.
Here is a side/body view of the first trail cam buck photo.
Sue
Beautiful buck Sue, good luck.
RWT
Yes sir, that is correct. I don't have the exact number with me, but it was 199 and change.
I think the buck being in velvet really emphasizes his mass. Comparing his ear width to the antler width, there is some mass there. The second picture really shows the forward length, and height of the rack. My first thought was 175 maybe, but after seeing the second picture, it may be low, for non-typical measurements. Typical will have some deductions. Like I say, seeing it in velvet sure ups the size. I think it is a "Shooter", even in Buffalo county.
Smitty; What is the inside width of that buck? 27"-28"
It must be nice to have enough land to manage your own herd. I know that QDM is a big factor also, with surrounding properties. Good luck.
"My buck grossed 205 7/8 and 202 5/8 net as a typical. As a non typical he was 211 3/4."
How does a deer net non-typical higher then he grosses? This is new to me. Generally a deer would gross 211 3/4, net typical 202 and net nontyp at 205. Even a nontypical will have deductions in his net score. You score the main frame typical rack of a nontyp as you would with a typical and then add in any nontypical inches that may have grown. The gross score of a deer is every inch of antler the deer grew, in my opinion this is the true score of a deer. If he grew it it should count.
I shot a deer a few years ago that went 176 6/8 gross, he was 168 net nontypical and 148 net typical. he missed the state book by 2 inches in either catagory and he was a true giant. Thats why I think net scores are a joke!!
1st Lazerwizzard scored my deer at 199 gross. His overall gross score of all antler measurements is 211 3/4. So he was not within a few inches. Gross score is before any deductions. I believe the picture of the deer that Sue turned in is a great buck but I do not believe he will score anywhere close to 200 like Lazerwizzard says.
Yoteslayer I did not say he (netted) a non typical score of 211. A non typical score is total gross of all antler measurements. There is no such thing as a net non typical score.(from what i'm told) I agree with you its to complicated and confusing and yes it should be the total of all measurements that matters but we do not get to make the rules. Pope and young and Boone and Crockett do. I believe they feel a typical is a more perfect set of antlers so if each side does not match perfectly they penalize the score by making deductions,after said deductions its net. With my deer just because he had split brow tines its an automatic deduction even though both brow tines were split and those tines can not be scored as typical. So as a typical he only had a 3 inch deduction which was awesome but those split brows hurt and I think that stinks. As you can see by the pic his main beams and other tines were very close to the same. What was frustrating for me was I hunted him for 3 years before getting him and wanted him with a bow bad. I was informed that as they get older past there prime ( 5,6 years old)they grow mass and loose tine length, so basically loose some score. The world record with a bow is 203 5/8 net typical. I truly believe if I could have gotten him in his prime and with a bow he would have been the new world record. Oh well so close but yet so far. hope this answered your questions.
Stlflyn his inside spread was 26.75
Keith
Sorry but you are the one who is incorrect here.
Gross score- total measurements of antler grown.
Net Typical score- Total measurements of all antler growth minus any abnormal points and uneven measurements.
Net Non-typical score- Total measurements of typical rack, minus uneven typical measurements, then you add in all "abnormal points", stickers, kickers, drop tines, split tines.
If you read through B&Cs score sheets they explain it very well. Very nice deer by the way, he is a stud.
I agree with you that the deer in the first picture is a 180" deer, but I cant guarentee that.
Also he said he scored your deer within 1.5% of the typical score, which he did. I think the software works fairly well, id like to see the results over 100 deer and see what the average is. That would be the true test.
I guess we disagree abnormal points are non typical points. If you look at a score sheet he can be scored as a gross typical than subtract for deductions. Scored as a gross typical does not count abnormal points
I thought he said he scored my buck to within a few inches and he did not. He said total gross score was 199 and the actual total gross score was 211
I am not a deer scorer just going by what I was told. But it does not make sense to me if your scoring a deer as a typical you would count the abnormal points in the gross typical score
Hey Sue,
Beautiful buck. I have 800 acres in Pike County, MO, 3 miles to the Mississippi River since 1986...right across the river from Pike County, Ill near Frankford, MO. My guess is that buck will score 190 gross and 175 net typical. Not near 200 net, IMO. I've shot them up to 190, to 185. too many deductions for a 200 net score and not enough stuff for a 200 gross score...but a real dandy anyway.
By this time in my area, the antler growth is done and bucks are starting to shed velvet. Please post pics when you get him to the barn! Measure him and prove me wrong...hope so!
milt
nice deer Mett56. And sorry Sue if we got too far off your deer pics. Now you guys got me itchy to go chase some deer. Guess I will have have to plan on taking some time off work this fall The owners, administrators and moderators of the Trapshooters.com have no obligation to keep objectionable messages off this forum. It is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners, administrators or moderators of Trapshooters.com Discussion Forum will be held responsible for the content of any message. The owners, administrators and moderators of the Trapshooters.com Discussion Forum reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason at our sole discretion. However, the owners, administrators and moderators are not monitoring or editing the site and are under no obligation to police it for items that some persons may find objectionable. [ Back ] To Register for full access to reply and create threads Click Here!
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ShootinSue
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 10:18 AM ET
Website Address:

Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: RickN
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 10:21 AM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ShootinSue
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 10:27 AM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Setterman
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 10:46 AM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ShootinSue
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 12:52 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Garry
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 01:05 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: BigBadBob
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 01:38 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ShootinSue
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 01:42 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: BigBadBob
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 01:49 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ShootinSue
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 01:53 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: CalvinMD
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 02:25 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: RickN
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 02:30 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: halfmile
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 02:48 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: BigBadBob
Email:
Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 - 10:18 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: CalvinMD
Email:
Date: Fri, Aug 17, 2012 - 01:45 AM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: slayer
Email:
Date: Fri, Aug 17, 2012 - 09:52 AM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ctreay
Email:
Date: Fri, Aug 17, 2012 - 07:32 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ReconDoc
Email:
Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 - 03:36 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: schneep
Email:
Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 - 03:50 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Laserwizard
Email:
Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 - 05:44 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ShootinSue
Email:
Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 - 05:58 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: YOTESLAYER
Email:
Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 - 06:43 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Laserwizard
Email:
Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 - 07:32 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: YOTESLAYER
Email:
Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 - 08:27 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ShootinSue
Email:
Date: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 - 05:39 AM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: wolfram
Email:
Date: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 - 01:10 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Shotshell
Email:
Date: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 - 01:45 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: RickN
Email:
Date: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 - 01:49 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ShootinSue
Email:
Date: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 - 02:02 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Laserwizard
Email:
Date: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 - 07:37 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: smitty0538
Email:
bowhunter40@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 - 10:46 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: tnshooter111
Email:
Date: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 - 11:16 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Laserwizard
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 09:22 AM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: ShootinSue
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 11:28 AM ET
Website Address:

Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Shotshell
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 11:38 AM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Laserwizard
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 12:04 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: Stl Flyn
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 12:46 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: YOTESLAYER
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 07:44 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: smitty0538
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 10:39 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: YOTESLAYER
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 10:51 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: YOTESLAYER
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 10:57 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: smitty0538
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 11:00 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: smitty0538
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 11:02 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: smitty0538
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 11:06 PM ET
Website Address:
Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: mette56
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 11:08 PM ET
Website Address:



Subject:
O/T Trail Cam Pic- Big Boy
From: smitty0538
Email:
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 - 11:22 PM ET
Website Address:
To Login to the discussion web Click Here!
To report problems with this site email email us